Maybe moving to CX5 from V6 sedan- seeking comment on acceleration ?

[maritimer555]

Hi Folks,

I'm a long time sedan buyer currently driving a 2007 Camry with V6. At one time I did own a 1989 626 and was quite happy with it.
Based on lobbying from my spouse (she drives a 2010 v6 Sante Fe) and chats with relatives, I'm considering switching from the Camry to a crossover / SUV.
Reasons are varied primarily for ease of access and safety.
I am looking at Honda CRV, Toyota Rav4, and Maxda CX5 and have a question for those loyal CX5 owners. The CX5 seems to have the edge on the reviews Im reading.

My 07 Camry is a very fast V6, which I love. I have yet to go test drive any of the Suvs.

It seems the 3 model Suvs Im looking at only come as 4 cylinders. Therefore Im wondering is the CX5 responsive enough on demand and will I regret my purchase ?

I would appreciate any comments from those of you that made the leap from a v6 sedan to a CX5.Are you happy with the acceleration and responsiveness ?

Another question surrounds factory Remote starter-the local sales guy tells me they are not installed at the factory, but they do offer a dealer installed Maxda supplied unit that would extend to the base warranty of the car. Have any of you purchased this and do you like it? Im not clear if its separate and distinct from the app mode (Which I dont want.)

 

[yrwei52]

Among three compact CUV's you listed, Mazda CX-5 would be the closest to resemble your 2007 Toyota Camry V6 (SE?) as CX-5 has the fastest acceleration and the best handling. However 184hp 4-banner on a compact CUV simply can't compete with a 268hp V6 sedan. You've to make some adjustment mentally to drive a compact CUV. You'd get better gas mileage and bigger space from CX-5 if you're looking at the brighter side.

Mazda does offer port-installed (will be listed on window sticker) or dealer-installed remote start with a separate fobs. It's covered under new car warranty.

 

[Triton46]

I bought my 13 CX5 GT (155 hp 2.0L I4) coming from a 2002 Nissan Maxima SE (255 hp 3.5 V6). Acceleration is not even close and I had no expectations that it would be. MPG are not close either (31 MPG with the CX5 vs 23 MPG with the Maxima).

 

[Ricsta]

Hi Folks,

I'm a long time sedan buyer currently driving a 2007 Camry with V6. At one time I did own a 1989 626 and was quite happy with it.
Based on lobbying from my spouse (she drives a 2010 v6 Sante Fe) and chats with relatives, I'm considering switching from the Camry to a crossover / SUV.
Reasons are varied primarily for ease of access and safety.
I am looking at Honda CRV, Toyota Rav4, and Maxda CX5 and have a question for those loyal CX5 owners. The CX5 seems to have the edge on the reviews Im reading.

My 07 Camry is a very fast V6, which I love. I have yet to go test drive any of the Suvs.

It seems the 3 model Suvs Im looking at only come as 4 cylinders. Therefore Im wondering is the CX5 responsive enough on demand and will I regret my purchase ?

I would appreciate any comments from those of you that made the leap from a v6 sedan to a CX5.Are you happy with the acceleration and responsiveness ?

Another question surrounds factory Remote starter-the local sales guy tells me they are not installed at the factory, but they do offer a dealer installed Maxda supplied unit that would extend to the base warranty of the car. Have any of you purchased this and do you like it? Im not clear if its separate and distinct from the app mode (Which I dont want.)

I went from a V6 SUV (2003 Highlander) to the CX5. I wanted a four cylinder for fuel economy purposes, but was concerned about having inadequate power (by comparison). I did lot of comparisons of HP to weight ratio and the CX5 was about 9% worse than the Highlander. I bought the CX5 and was surprised how well powered it felt compared to the Highlander. After going back and looking at the specs, I attributed it to the fact that the CX5 peak torque is at 3,250 RPM vs 4,400 for the Highlander. Bottom line, I'm very happy with engine and torque in the CX5. Coupled with it's transmission and handling, it's much better than the Highlander.

 

[sillyxone]

Be sure to at least test drive the Sport mode of 2016 to see if it could satisfy your thirst just a bit. Also, the manual mode (of Automatic) is not too bad.

 

[purplengold]

I've owned mine for about a month and I'm still absolutely in love with my cx5. For me the acceleration and power, especially in sport mode puts a smile on my face. I come from an 07 Element or should I say Honda Elephant, so the cx5 kicks ass in comparison to what I'm used to. I'm more concerned with mpg and efficiency than power so the cx5 is perfect. The AWD and superior road handling was what completely sold me. In my opinion the CX5 is probably the most fun car I've ever driven. I'm considering adding the paddle shifters.

 

[Tccox]

I came from a 2014 BMW 228 Msport 0-6- 5.6 seconds to my 2016 CX-5 7.7 0-60. Don't miss the BMW a bit. acceleration is just fine

 

[Av8torjim]

I came from a 1997 BMW 328i (I-6, 190 hp) at 6.8 seconds. I don't miss the acceleration at all. One second to 60? I don't drag race, so who cares?

 

[inlinev]

I have a v6 accord, the cx5 is slower, but the cx5 is very responsive and the transmission shifts faster. So it feels very peppy.

 

[fdew]

I came from a V6 Audi Allroad with twin turbos. The Audi was faster but the SX-5 does satisfy my need for speed and handling. When I floor it it makes me grin.
BTW for your test drive, when you floor it do it quickly. The Mazda looks at pedal position,AND how it got there.

 

[wlong01]

I bought my 13 CX5 GT (155 hp 2.0L I4) coming from a 2002 Nissan Maxima SE (255 hp 3.5 V6). Acceleration is not even close and I had no expectations that it would be. MPG are not close either (31 MPG with the CX5 vs 23 MPG with the Maxima).

I also came from a V6 Maxima. The CX-5 cannot match the acceleration of the Maxima but it's still pretty decent. It has more than enough power for everyday driving.
One thing I don't miss is the premium fuel and the 18/24 mpg of the Max. There's always sport mode that will make you feel like you have 200 hp under the hood.
Test drive the CX-5 on some long windy roads then take it out on the highway.

 

[ALafya]

A Camry V6 is a pretty peppy vehicle, straight line acceleration is pretty good but the chassis and steering are not as good when a turn is involved That's where the CX-5 might surprise you.
I moved from an Accord V6 to an I4 Accord to the CX-5. The I4 Accord was lower on power but otherwise a better vehicle then the V6 and I did not miss the extra power.
I find the CX-5 accelerates nicely and there is no real need for more power.

I got the CX-5 mainly because I wanted an AWD vehicle for our ski trips. Otherwise, I would not likely get a crossover but a sedan or hatchback instead. I do prefer the lower center of gravity for better handling and the better fuel economy in these configurations. I don't think you are safer in a CX-5 over a Camry. I don't know your situation and not meaning to pass any criticism, but I hope I will never reach a day where an easier entry/exit to a vehicle would be a motivating factor for me.
Keep in mind that a sedan will be more spacious and a little more comfortable, especially in the back.

 

[vroom]

For what its worth, I agree with ALafya that a CUV won't be any safer than a sedan. Crash tests perform about the same. The CUV might give you better visibility and awareness, but higher center of gravity makes it more prone to roll. Sort of cancels out.

 

[Unobtanium]

Hi Folks,

I'm a long time sedan buyer currently driving a 2007 Camry with V6. At one time I did own a 1989 626 and was quite happy with it.
Based on lobbying from my spouse (she drives a 2010 v6 Sante Fe) and chats with relatives, I'm considering switching from the Camry to a crossover / SUV.
Reasons are varied primarily for ease of access and safety.
I am looking at Honda CRV, Toyota Rav4, and Maxda CX5 and have a question for those loyal CX5 owners. The CX5 seems to have the edge on the reviews I’m reading.

My 07 Camry is a very fast V6, which I love. I have yet to go test drive any of the Suv’s.

It seems the 3 model Suv’s I’m looking at only come as 4 cylinders. Therefore I’m wondering is the CX5 responsive enough on demand and will I regret my purchase ?

I would appreciate any comments from those of you that made the leap from a v6 sedan to a CX5.Are you happy with the acceleration and responsiveness ?

Another question surrounds factory Remote starter-the local sales guy tells me they are not installed at the factory, but they do offer a dealer installed Maxda supplied unit that would extend to the base warranty of the car. Have any of you purchased this and do you like it? I’m not clear if it’s separate and distinct from the “app” mode (Which I don’t want.)

I came from a Grand Jeep Cherokee with a HEMI, and a 370Z, and LS7 Z06 before that. The CX5 blows chunks for performance, although it is well balanced and FEELS like it's fast because the chassis communicates very well. If you're buying this for acceleration, save your time and money, and don't. If you're buying it because it will suit your needs efficiently, then it's a helluva buy that is a bit less boring than its stable mates.

 

[Kedis82ZE8]

It's doesn't compare speed-wise to my G35x (0-60 ~5.5 sec) but everything else about CX-5 satisfies my needs.

 

[tsouzee]

They're slow. I test drove one and that was really my only issue. Was looking to purchase one and now found out that the '16's have a lower front passenger crash rating than the '15, so still on the fence.

 

[Scythe024]

I came from a modified 06 evo 9 to the CX-5. Obviously it's not going to throw you back in your seat, but acceleration and responsiveness has been good considering the size of the engine and mpg. I'm qute happy with it. I never have issues getting to speed or passing people when needed. I know they are coming out with a turbo version next year which sounds temping, but honestly while the power would be nice, i rather save the money on gas, both by not having to pay for 91 oct and the mpg difference that is likely to come.

 

[fdew]

I don't know your situation and not meaning to pass any criticism, but I hope I will never reach a day where an easier entry/exit to a vehicle would be a motivating factor for me.

I also hope that is never a factor for you but stuff happens. I can get in and out of anything but once in a low sedan or sports car I am good for 20 min. or so before I must stop and get out due to pain. I simply can't sit low with my legs out in front of me. I can drive a CX-5 for 5 hrs and want more. So I grateful Mazda decided to design a compact SUV that is fun to drive. Otherwise I would have a very tough choice.

 

[123373]

If your happy with your wife's Sante Fe, than you will be happy with the CX5 as they are within a second 0-60 of each other. If you are a peddle mashing speed demon, not so much compared to your Camry.

 

[fdew]

I came from a Grand Jeep Cherokee with a HEMI, and a 370Z, and LS7 Z06 before that. The CX5 blows chunks for performance, although it is well balanced and FEELS like it's fast because the chassis communicates very well. If you're buying this for acceleration, save your time and money, and don't. If you're buying it because it will suit your needs efficiently, then it's a helluva buy that is a bit less boring than its stable mates.

Jeep 6.5
CX-5. 7.9