I hope this doesn't cause a huge argument but can anyone tell me the advantages and disadvantages to both of these tuning options. I'm a little green and can't really decide which would give me the best result. I know the AP is cheaper than the Standback but it seems the Standback has more add-on's that might make it better even though it costs more.
Can anyone clear this up for me? I'm so confused!!!
-Max
The SB is a Piggy Back. It changes nothing and lies to your ECU as to what the ECU sees.
The AP is a Flash. It changes the actual tables in the ECU.
The AP out of the box:
- Custom Tune Capabilities
- Pre-loaded maps that work for many people
- Full Throttle Control
- Gauges - Boost, AFR, KR, IAT, BAT Etc. on the device
- Data Logging
- Plug and Play
Cobb Extras - None
The SB Out of the Box
- Custom Tune Capabilities
- Expensive Boost Controller without tuning
- Gauges (on a laptop) but no KR (which is a must for our car)
- Data Logging - Via Laptop
- External 5v source
SB Extras - Full Control Flash, Plug and Play Harness, Larger MAF Flash, Cold Cut Fix Flash.
It really boils down to what your intentions are. If you want a simple flash and go, then it's the AP hands down. If you can tune yourself, then ether solution will work for you with the AP having more capabilities tuning wise. The SB does support a 5v source which is nice if you plan to run meth.
To me its a no brainer now that the AP can be custom tuned via the ATR. It simply brings more to the table and way more user friendly at a much cheaper cost (if you factor in the extras you have to purchase for the SB to make it comparable) not to mention it is a flash and does not lie to your ecu.
The SB out of the box simply pales in comparison to the AP and you have to spend more money to get what the AP comes with out of the box. On top of that you have to tune it yourself or have someone do a custom tune for you as out of the box the SB is just a boost controller and not much more.
However, for what it does, the SB is a good device.