That's my plan. I have the 24-70 now. Next up is the 70-200 2.8![]()
do you guys all shoot with full frame bodies?
I can almost guarantee you that you nor I will ever see that day that nikon or canon makes a SLR that is not backwards compatible with all previous lenses.
When I say that I mean the mounts will not change. Focusing and auto metering may not work but they will ALL mount and be able to take pictures.
With they ever release a non-compatible both will have thrown away usage of millions of lenses. Not going to happen.
And to people looking for new cameras visit Ken Rockwell.
If you got a 17-55 and a 70-200 I promise you that you will not miss the difference in between!!
And the constant 2.8 will make up for "short comings" you may find.
http://asianguywithacamera.com/images/misc/camera_gear/Canon_5D_MKII/images/5d_mkii_09.jpg[img]
(hi)[/QUOTE]
Wanker...
I've been thinking about the 17-55 IS. I just want a REALLY good short lens (L-series quality) for car / static shots. I also desparately want that 50mm 1.4, but I can't justify the cost right now. I think my next two lenses are going to be the 100-400L IS followed by the 17-55 IS...
Wanker...
I would pretty much kill for that combo!! Then maybe a nice fast ultra wide lens to finish it off.
Not everyone.
do you guys all shoot with full frame bodies?
No I shoot with a Canon 50D and my Xti is my "backup"
I'm planning on swappig to Nikon next year when business is a bit more profitable.![]()
heheheh
photo contest thread????
that's a heck of a toy!
I like the chair. Do you maybe have a link or something so I can take a closer look?