Poor resale value means he got the car used for a great price. I think that means he got great value for what he wanted.
His car is basically a Mercedes with none of the typical Chrysler reliability issues.
He is the owner and he's not complaining.
You are saying his car which is almost entirely Mercedes parts from the SLK and an S-class rear suspension is poorly engineered?
If he cared about cargo area or number of seats, he'd have purchased a different car, so your complaints here are dumb.
He doesn't care about the design, I imagine he rather likes it. It's a good thing aesthetics are entirely subjective things, frankly. I imagine you've a face only a mother could love, but that's just me.
The automatic in his car is the same automatic that's in other Mercedes SLK AMG's. Are they crappy automatics, too? Or is it just when you take the same components and slap a Chrysler badge on them that you pee your pants with futile car opinion rage?
And while you are entitled to your opinion, you are not entitled to be an ass because someone bought a car you wouldn't, while at the same time having the gall to like it.
Please stop talking.
let me help with your critical thinking here while you're being happy and angry at the same time...
i am talking about a NEW CROSSFIRE $50K car VS. a NEW MS3 $25K car.
now, congrats to him he bought it for 19k with low miles, best of luck to him and i hope he enjoys the car for many yrs to come.