That shortage of "consistent oil pressure & feed to the con rods" may explain the following:
1 - Con rod expansion, which causes rotational friction with the crank's pin journal side walls. Thus...your shattered con rod(s).
2 - The fact that the oil pressure warning light didn't come on. It only requires 2-6psi of oil pressure keep the light off.
A bit long....and after re-reading this one myself, sounds like I need a new hobby.
So many questions, thanks for the interest.
First a question for you. Am I correct in my interpretation of what you wrote, that there would be insufficient cooling of the rod bearings with oil pressures high enough to keep the oil pressure light switch from closing? If that is true, and with the actual occurrence of fire due to the failure, isnt this enough of a hazard to warrant a NHSTA recall? Ill explore that further this weekend.
Back to your questions:
Before my wife left for the trip, I checked the fluids, so Im sure the correct quantity of oil was used.
The dealer where the car was towed is 100 miles away from my home. It was dark when I picked my wife up there so I didnt get a good look at the car. Ill be picking the car up from the dealer this weekend and transporting it home. After I get the car home, Ill take a look at the things that you suggest except for those that I would need to disassemble the car to see. The Service Manager at Wheeler tells me that the threads in the pan are pristine.
As of now, Mazda will not be honoring a warranty claim without a huge fight. This is in spite of the fact that it has been acknowledged that there was no error on mine or my wifes part.
Based on the fact that the engine failure caused a fire, Customer Assistance has also made a demand that I file a claim with my car insurance company. I did that this afternoon. Even if the insurance company does payout for the fire (only part of the loss) they will seek restitution from the entity responsible for the cause of the fire, Mazda.
Im still very pissed that Mazda doesnt step up to the plate and handle this as warranty. There are so many reasons why they should.
1. Mazda is the holder of the warranty.
2. Even if the drain plug was the cause of the loss of oil, the oil pressure indicator failed to provide sufficient warning to prevent catastrophic failure. They designed the car and selected the components.
3. They licensed the franchise dealer that serviced the car, therefore the have the best recourse to seek restitution.
Am I missing something?