Mazda 2.5L engine

erhayes

Contributor
:
2022CX5 PP
Was interested in the 2.5L I4 Mazda engine used in the new Mazda 6 and an option in the 2010 Mazda 3. I was looking at the bore & stroke dimensions and was disappointed that it appears to be a stretched 2.0 to a 2.3 and finally to a 2.5 L. Most newly designed engines have a bore stroke ration of ~ 1 to 1 i.e 3.5X3.5 etc. It is especially importance in an I4 to strive for a shorter stroke because of the primary and secondary vibration produced by a I4 configuration. I now understand why the magazine described the engine as being course and noisy over the 2 & 2.3 L. Mazda has increased the stroke from a long 3.7 inches to 3.95 inches but only increased the bore by 0.080 inch. I think all Mazda did was to make a stroker crank and polish out 0.080 from the cylinders. I had hoped for a new sheet of paper or at least a new block with a Bore stroke ratio of something approaching 1 to 1. I guess they saved some block retooling money.(killit)
 
Last edited:
No comments ?
I agree with you ED, mostly a stroke job. Hope that this doesnt ruin the smoothness of the 2.3 in our daughters Mazda 3 hb. Went by the Mazda tech center here is SoCal yesterday and they allready had over 20 new 2010
smiley 3's in the lot. They look better in person than in the magazines. (cool)
 
The 2.0 & 2.3 engines ARE smooth over the full rpm range. The long stroke 2.5 is according to magazine testers is noisy and coarse is the words I think they used. Was sorry to hear that.
 
I have driven the 09 Mazda 6 with the 2.5L and I thought it was smoother and quieter than the 2.3L in our 06 Mazda 3. It wasn't alot quieter, but it was definately significantly smoother.
 
At what rpm Mazda 3? Usually the long stroke engine have trouble keeping smoothness as the revs go up.
 
At what rpm Mazda 3? Usually the long stroke engine have trouble keeping smoothness as the revs go up.

The drive I took it on wasn't a long cruise, so I'm not sure about crusing RPM and noise. But putting the car through it's paces the engine was a little quieter and alot smoother under hard acceleration.
 
Back