Just got my April 2008 Car and Driver magazine. There is a long term road test (40k miles) of the CX-7 on page 104.
Seems like they mostly liked it. They liked the handling, brakes, interior, styling.
Things they disliked:
-Turbo 4-cylinder engine = They didn't see a need for it, and thought there should be a 6. Basically the gas mileage was same/worse than 6-cylinder counterparts.
-Road/wind noise
-Automatic transmission (seems like they didn't like when it shifted)
-No mileage/trip info and no outside temp (they were reviewing a Touring not a GT).
Overall they rated it pretty good but should have a v-6.
I guess I have to agree with most of what they say. I really like my cx-7. I don't agree with the transmission. I like it.
I do agree with the road/wind noise and turbo 4-cylinder. I guess I don't have a problem with the 4, but there really isn't any need for it because the mileage isn't any better than anything else. Not sure how much weight it saves over a v-6.
BTW... Sorry about the title but the forums are hosed and won't accept a title with spaces in it.
Seems like they mostly liked it. They liked the handling, brakes, interior, styling.
Things they disliked:
-Turbo 4-cylinder engine = They didn't see a need for it, and thought there should be a 6. Basically the gas mileage was same/worse than 6-cylinder counterparts.
-Road/wind noise
-Automatic transmission (seems like they didn't like when it shifted)
-No mileage/trip info and no outside temp (they were reviewing a Touring not a GT).
Overall they rated it pretty good but should have a v-6.
I guess I have to agree with most of what they say. I really like my cx-7. I don't agree with the transmission. I like it.
I do agree with the road/wind noise and turbo 4-cylinder. I guess I don't have a problem with the 4, but there really isn't any need for it because the mileage isn't any better than anything else. Not sure how much weight it saves over a v-6.
BTW... Sorry about the title but the forums are hosed and won't accept a title with spaces in it.