kane.s2k said:yes, when I say valve cover, I mean PCV. I wrote it like that because some people install a catch can on the breather side as well and the same order still applies.
kane.s2k said:Definitely put a filter onto it.
GhostOne said:But that is where it would go then, correct? If so I think I understand and will probably be ordering one towards the end of the month when my birthday money comes in. Thanks again for all the info.
Kypatrick said:I recently changed my PCV and noticed it and the lines to it were wet with oil.
I rememeber seeing a Steeda ( I Think) kit that installed after the PCV valve to prevent oil from running back into the Intake Manifold on Mustangs. It looked alot like a screen style in-line fuel filter. So I went to an Auto Store and bought an In-line fuel filter ( A cheap one because im not sure if its gonna work out) and Installed it after the PCV and before the "T" that goes back into the manifold. So far I noticed it HAS collected a few drops of oil, this is just after 2 days.
kane.s2k said:Yep, your idea is correct and would work fine. Except it wouldn't pass emissions that way like here in CA.
GhostOne said:Really? I know they are pretty strict out here in VA as well, can you tell me why it wouldn't pass and what I would need to do in order to get it to pass?
shane02pro5 said:This is in reference to venting your crancase (side of valve cover) thru a filter and releasing these vapors directly into the atmosphere vs. running through a vac hose back into the intake tract which eventually makes it's way out throught the exhaust (catalytic converter) and if burned off before entering the atmosphere.
kane.s2k said:motor oil is low in octane. So it will also lower the octane overall in the combustion chamber. The krank vents produce a reduction in oil vapor/blow-by overall so it dramatically keeps the oil from going into the combustion chamber.