why does nasa keep putting the oldest damn planes into space. I realize that they have not had that many issues with failier but come on. chalenger was the sec oldest and now columbia being the oldest and both have failed. I reilize also that it is cost prohibitive to build new space crafts all the time but it seems to me that a plane as old as the columbia (20+years mabey more) should not have been flying.
And to those who say that airplanes are alot older and still fly. How many airplanes are subject to the extreams of rentering the atmosphear. NONE? thatis why they last longer. the columbia had been in some 100+ missions. That meens that 100 or more times that craft has been subjected to the hardest forces of any flying machine in the world! And we wonder why it has failed this time
Shame on NASA.
And to those who say that airplanes are alot older and still fly. How many airplanes are subject to the extreams of rentering the atmosphear. NONE? thatis why they last longer. the columbia had been in some 100+ missions. That meens that 100 or more times that craft has been subjected to the hardest forces of any flying machine in the world! And we wonder why it has failed this time
Shame on NASA.