To the gentleman who wrote about why OEM dont use thermal spacers in production cars, heres why:
You have to understand how production costs work (and i aint got the time or space to discuss that in whole) and it would NOT cost them $20 for a piece of metal (which these spacer, last time i checked are not metal but, are a composite of some sort), more like cents. They also use outsourcing to make their cars. This lowers cost and raises profit margins and when doing so the penny pinchers will always look at places to cut costs and this would be one of them.
The cars today run fine in almost every single case and never need one for the life of the engine that the manufacturer has determined they pretty much want. Remember, this part could actually in some minute way increase engine life and they DO want you to buy another car from them to keep profits. Ita all a money game and you jsut will not see something like this anymore on cars. But back in the ole' carb days, it was more common because of heat soak. GM cars still have probs w/ heat soak to this day for some odd reason, esp. their starters(off topic).
If a(n) manufactuer EVER used one of these things, it would have to be used on like ALL of their engines due tot he increased costs to have one put on say, on an Mazdaspeed Protege'. By only making a few for a few production cars, more money on labour will wasted because the engines would have to be further seperated on the line, thus, increasing costs and so on. This is a very brief explanation and Im sure there are some areas that SOMEONE will pick over and say Im wrong but, oh well....