- :
- CX5
Mazda starts new production of CX-5 in Hofu Plant.
.http://www2.mazda.com/en/publicity/release/2017/201710/171017a.html
.http://www2.mazda.com/en/publicity/release/2017/201710/171017a.html
Where Is Mazda Headed Next?
- Thread starter GJ-Molestor
- Start date
- :
- 2022 CX-5 Turbo
It makes sense.
CX5 is out-selling Mazda6 by 5:1. Produce more CX5s and less Mazda6.
I have both. I can see why.
What are you seeing that GJ isn't? More out of curiosity than anything I need (yes need) an awd vehicle so the CX5 it is and will likely remain for comfortable economical commuting..but if an AWD 6 were to materialize (as its been rumored) I'd certainly consider it.
- :
- 2021 CX-9 Sig
- :
- 2021 CX-5 GT
Which is why unless they can make a competitive Mazda 3 or Mazda 6, they should drop them from the USA and focus on the CX series and the Miata. Bring the CX-4 to the USA. Offer the CX-3, CX-4, CX-5, CX-7 and CX-9. The CX-7 should be the CX-5 with a faster engine and more luxury!
Honestly, I've had mostly cars until now, and this is my first SUV ever. I went with it for the AWD, and the ground clearance, since I'm going to be doing a lot of commuting over partially uncleared snowy roads in the next couple of years. I must say, the handling and driving dynamics of the CX-5 are on par with most cars I've driven, and it sits some 2 - 3" higher off the ground, which is perfect for the snow, ice, off-road camping adventures, etc etc.
That being said, I WILL have another sports car in the next 5 - 7 years, it just won't be new, and it'll be a project for the track mostly and some weekend cruises. (headbang)
Already exists in certain markets
The added ground clearance does give some added breathing room when the going gets rough no question..so i get that..cargo flexibility too.
May i humbly suggest the brz for that purpose..great news is gen2 looks all but a lock and said to be going on a diet. Wouldn't fault the miata option i just fit better and prefer the flatter turn in of the twins...if you drove one years ago the 17 with the updated gearing, dampers and brakes on perf pkg definitely raised its game even if not so much in the numbers just a lot of fun and driving engagement..I can't wait!
I drove a FR-S when I opted for the Genesis Coupe. I found it under-powered for it's size, and it seemed cheaply built inside. Very tossable though, not denying it was decently fun, I just found the Genesis to be a better car for the money at the time. But if it goes on a diet and gains turbo, I'd be all in. Even take out the turbos, I'd be willing to build a turbo project for the right money if it didn't feel so sluggish/heavy for the chosen motor from stock.
As for the MX-5, I'm thinking by the time I'm ready to buy, the current gen will probably be up on the used marketplace for a decent dollar. I rather the current MX-5 over the current twins any day. Better looking, better interior, and despite not having a whole lot of power, it's a fun and well-balanced car.
I've also mulled over the idea of a used Corvette or Mustang GT in the future. But hey, seems like some companies are putting out some more sports cars in the near future, so maybe there'll be more to choose from in the lightly used market down the road. Can someone say new JDM era?
EDIT: I should probably clarify, I'm not calling the current twins unbalanced, they're great in turns, but the lack of exit power is very apparent.
As for the MX-5, I'm thinking by the time I'm ready to buy, the current gen will probably be up on the used marketplace for a decent dollar. I rather the current MX-5 over the current twins any day. Better looking, better interior, and despite not having a whole lot of power, it's a fun and well-balanced car.
I've also mulled over the idea of a used Corvette or Mustang GT in the future. But hey, seems like some companies are putting out some more sports cars in the near future, so maybe there'll be more to choose from in the lightly used market down the road. Can someone say new JDM era?
EDIT: I should probably clarify, I'm not calling the current twins unbalanced, they're great in turns, but the lack of exit power is very apparent.
I think the Subie has a better (not great) interior and the incremental changes (gearing/dampers) have much improved the overall experience. Wouldn't fault you for wanting more power but if they can cut 150-200# it would go a long way toward no need. As it stands I was shocked at how snappy the miata rf that i drove felt with just 155. I could also probably be happy in the v6 Camaro...drove great, sounded great but feels like you're in a fox hole..dark..visability a hazard.
So what else would help Mazda grow? Better resale, more long term confidence in products. If they want to sell more cars (or should i say suvs) here beefing up that warranty and making sure people know about it would be a good start wouldn't it? Money, but money well spent i think:
4/50 b2b
6/70 powertrain or up to 4 unlimited for power users
So what else would help Mazda grow? Better resale, more long term confidence in products. If they want to sell more cars (or should i say suvs) here beefing up that warranty and making sure people know about it would be a good start wouldn't it? Money, but money well spent i think:
4/50 b2b
6/70 powertrain or up to 4 unlimited for power users
GJ-Molestor
Banned
- :
- 2011 BMW 528i, 2015 Mazda 6, 1995 Nissan Maxima Manual
I drove a FR-S when I opted for the Genesis Coupe. I found it under-powered for it's size, and it seemed cheaply built inside. Very tossable though, not denying it was decently fun, I just found the Genesis to be a better car for the money at the time. But if it goes on a diet and gains turbo, I'd be all in. Even take out the turbos, I'd be willing to build a turbo project for the right money if it didn't feel so sluggish/heavy for the chosen motor from stock.
As for the MX-5, I'm thinking by the time I'm ready to buy, the current gen will probably be up on the used marketplace for a decent dollar. I rather the current MX-5 over the current twins any day. Better looking, better interior, and despite not having a whole lot of power, it's a fun and well-balanced car.
I've also mulled over the idea of a used Corvette or Mustang GT in the future. But hey, seems like some companies are putting out some more sports cars in the near future, so maybe there'll be more to choose from in the lightly used market down the road. Can someone say new JDM era?
EDIT: I should probably clarify, I'm not calling the current twins unbalanced, they're great in turns, but the lack of exit power is very apparent.
I don’t think the FR-S is good value at all. It does handle wonderfully, but the engine revs out with the smoothness of an industrial blender and the lack of torque in the mid range (where you need torque) is simply ridiculous. Mazda smartly sticks to their inline 4’s, and they have done one hell of a job delivering a smooth, linear powerband with no dip in torque or surprises.
Anyways, if I was in the market for a sports car I think I would take my chances with a BMW 328i from 2009 or a Z4 with the older naturally aspirated Inline 6 motor. Much better engine then the Genesis or FR-S and very reliable.
Neither of those sports cars imo (but whatever to each their own) I can certainly appreciate your affinity for BMW's NA I6 tho I thought my 128 could've used more torque and an LSD..Subaru's most reliable car right now fwiw: BRZ
24/7 community defender of: gen1 CX-5s steering and styling, compression ignition, twins, winter tires, manual: tailgates, transmissions, ebrakes in no particular order oh and liquid silver FTMFW!
24/7 community defender of: gen1 CX-5s steering and styling, compression ignition, twins, winter tires, manual: tailgates, transmissions, ebrakes in no particular order
oh and liquid silver FTMFW!
Last edited:
Sooo jealous of that and I think they'd make more than a few converts if they did the same here..I assume they wanted to test the NA waters with you guys first or maybe they just like you guys more...still waiting Mazda!
- :
- Denver, CO
Problem with BMWs is that they come from the factory without turn signals. Or if they do, they are broken and non-operative.
If I were to go with a BMW it would probably be a 128 or an M235. Like both of those a lot.
As for the Genesis and FR-S/BRZ, I agree there are better motors out there, especially for power output in the case of the twins. But it's difficult to find motors for the price brand new that the Genesis delivers, or balance and turn in that the twins offer. I've said it from the get go, if they just put the WRX motors/turbo setup in the BRZ, it would have been a perfect factory car bargain, even if it cost a couple grand more.
I had my Genesis putting out around 300 ft.lb. wtq and 260 whp for around $3000 though (from the baseline of ~220 crank for both, can't remember the exact figures), and that includes the clutch and flywheel upgrades, tuning, and bolt-on mods to support. It'd be difficult to do that with another car that only costs around $26k new. And that's on a first gen, second gen is capable of far greater things with far less money right from the factory.
- :
- Denver, CO
I just remember seeing the Genesis Coupe in Burn Notice.
