Your response makes me laugh. "Since I didn't read your post"??? Umm... if I hadn't READ your post, I wouldn't have been able to COMMENT on many of the SPECIFIC points you made. Just for the record, the quote you're refering to simply said "It cannot be compared to any other car on the road." Obviously you meant to add "for the money" (which you said later on, but, since it wasn't part of the previous sentence, can't be assumed." But who cares? This isn't English class so I won't get on you for poor written communication. Now that I know what you meant, I suppose your statement makes more sense.
That said, I'm not sure if you've read MY post in entirety. These incentives that I referred to (which create a large disparity between the two cars in terms of price) are temporary and, depending on when you bought YOUR car, may not have been something you were able to take advantage of. In reality, that's irrelevant. My point of contention with you was that you feel the MS6 has a higher quality interior. You also feel that this is only something that can be proved with science. If my previous post (along with it's extreme -for a reason- "dodge omni" reference- didn't adaquately address this ridiculous notion of yours, nothing I say will. So why bother to say any more? You're happy with your car and that's all that matters. The last thing I'd ever want to do is contribute to buyers-remorse. So, despite the fact that you most likely never even drove (or even sat in) an LGT (and if you say you have, that only makes your comments that much more absurd) , go on and believe your car is superior in virtually every way.