dficken said:
Hello everyone. I am currently in the market of buying one of two cars. Either the Protege5 or the WRX wagon. I have been doing tons of research and am currently leaning towards the protege5. I like the exterior styling of both (both are unique) but like the interior of the mazda better. I test drove both of them the other day and was impressed with all the features of the protege5. But the power of the WRX blew me away. I am curious if I could ask for other opinions here. Considering you had the extra 5 grand for the WRX, which one would you have bought? It is a tough decision for me at the moment.
I would either pick a stick on the WRX or a "sport" auto and leather interior on the protege5. (btw, has anyone driven with the sport auto yet? If so, what do you think?)
I have a 77 Trans Am that is 80% restored so if i purchase the protege5, i could use the extra cash to finish it. But the protege5 is lacking power. The other question I had was, do the few standard "bolt on" mods bump it up that extra notch? Also, I would be very interested in the turbo kit, but would be worried about reliability. Afterall, the car will be my daily driver for quite some time (hopefully). Any comments on reliability on specific kits?
All in all, I am just looking to see what others would do in the same situation.
Thank you for your time and I look forward to your responses.
Regards,
dficken.
You'll be happier with the WRX if you are going to be judging your daily drive by how strong it can pull you around on the road. You'll be more than satisfied with the Protege5 if you prefer a zippy and fairly tight cornering vehicle on the way to where-ever you go. Not to mention the Protege5 comes with very good brakes.
If you bought the Protege5 thinking you'll save up some money to spend on your '77 Trans Am, then I guess you're not planning on modifying your Protege5? Upgrading both cars of yours, especially the Protege5 power-wise, will probably cost you near what you would get by just purchasing the WRX in the first place.
Since you like both the WRX and Protege5 looks, then you wouldn't have to mess around with the cosmetic aspect of the vehicle. You have the WRX all ready for you to drive as you please. I do agree the Protege5 has a nicer interior than the WRX. I, personally, can live with fewer horsepower just so I can be happy with the interior each day I'm in it.
For me, I have slight problem with the WRX body design. So, I couldn't see myself driving one of those on a daily basis. That's why I got the MP3... design that pleases me, audio sound system that I don't have to necessarily improve upon immediately, and an engine horsepower that I can live with without modification should I choose to do so in the future. Not to mention that I achieved my MAIN goal, and that was to save up a lot of money compared with the RSX Type-S, Celica GT-S, and BMW 325i. The Eclipse GT was on my list, but because of the lack of quality Mitsubishi had placed on the GT... it was not reasonable for me in the long haul. WRX was on my list just because of having a turbo, AWD and MSRP barely under US$24K. I'm more impressed with the AWD than I am with its turbo.
At the time the SE-R Spec V was just a short wait, but I didn't like the body style at all (worse than my opinion on the WRX). I felt good to do without so much horsepower for a bit more eye-candy. The Altima 2.5 was something I test drove too, but I was too picky on the rear-end height (too high), otherwise the style was not bad... for approximately $25K on a car, I had to be 100% comfortable with everything about it... and I wasn't with the Altima.
My criterias were (happened to match the MP3):
1) Budget, which was under US$25K (walk-out)
Otherwise, over US$25K the car would have
to be very unique quality with almost everything
I want already in it.
Nothing near or over US$30K. I couldn't afford it.
2) Preferrably 4-door.
3) QUALITY, QUALITY, and MORE QUALITY!
The car must be built well. No cheap feeling interior.
When the center console wobbles just by placing my
hands on it (*cough* Eclipse GT), then that's probably
going to scare me away if I have other options.
4) I'm going to have a good quality audio system in there
whether or not it comes with it. Just so happens the MP3
had it all in there. I'm not one who needs a huge
subwoofer or several of them to listen for music, but I like
deep bass and clear treble... overall quality sound. That's
the most important part of driving (besides paying
attention to the road), is to enjoy the music you listen to.
5) Uniquely factory customized. Basically it has to look
good on the inside as well as the outside.
Too many plastic chrome decoration (*cough* Eclipse!)
is ugly. MP3's 17" wheels, leather steering wheel,
aftermarket pedals and leather shift knob were very
nice on the eyes.
Now... only number 6 of my criterias did I not follow directly.
6) It MUST be able to fit my mountain bike.
That was why the Protege5 and Matrix (at first!) were high on MY list. Then, that's when I saw the MP3 in person at the dealership. I gave in when I test drove the MP3, almost said yes without test driving it. I figured I would just buy a roof rack (since trunk rack would have gotten in the way of the wings) to compensate later, which I did immediately later that same week right after I had the tint done to it. I'm one of the odd ones, I was really happy the MP3 didn't come with a moon roof. Every car I test drove I always asked if they have an option with NO sunroof. Such as the Celica GT-S, they didn't come with a no-sunroof option.
By the way, the Matrix is U-G-L-Y when seen in person. On mags and on the internet they looked pretty cool. Especially when they fitted that bike via a bike rail in the trunk... that was sweet looking. I think also too much chrome in it.
So I personally favor the Protege5 a lot. If the Protege5 had what the MP3 had out of the dealership parking lot, then I would have bought that instead, no doubt about it. With or without that extra 5 grand.
Good luck.