^^^ Lost to the MUCH less powerful C30 ^^^
It was also a version 1.0 that has the base suspension.
Also, 0-130, the SRT4 wins, by .2
lmao!
^^^ Lost to the MUCH less powerful C30 ^^^
It was also a version 1.0 that has the base suspension.
Also, 0-130, the SRT4 wins, by .2
some of us want more than fast in a straight line.
Wanting more than 'fast in a straight line' is an opinion or preference
1. It's much scarier to corner in than an MS3.
2. It's got massive potential to go fast in a straight line.
3. Some of of us want more than "fast in a straight line" from our cars.
4. It's ugly.
5. It's too SUV-ish.
6. It can be a practical car.
7. The SRT guys know how to make "fast" happen.
interesting you say this...there is a post on the caliber forum where a member posted that when he calls dodge and told them he has an srt that is being built...they always asked him is it an awd or a fwd model....now I wonder why they would do that? it would be nice if it were awd!
and you know the ms3 and the csrt weigh almost the same right? so you drive a pig too i guess?!?
Uhh, no he drives an MS6.
isnt this whole power argument void when it comes to a comparison between our car and the csrt4? we have 20ftbls more torque and in the long run i'd rather have that torque than the horsepower. horsepower doesnt mean jack if you dont have the torque to back it. look at hondas, you know? when i had my focus all i had was an intake, exhaust and a tune with that alone i would spank si's all day long. (though admittedly thats kinda like the special olympics) but point being is that horsepower wise i had less power but more torque that was always the difference. its the same anywhere you go though and i have this talk with my girlfriend and her "camaro" friends a lot.
look at hondas, you know?
Pretty sure that "some of us want more than fast in a straight line" is indeed a fact.
I know I do, so even if it's just me, it makes that statement a complete fact.
I'll give $1000 to whomever can beat my MSP down a backroad in a stock Caliber SRT-4.
Laloosh, do you want an cailber?stock for stock, mod for mod your msp will get s*** on by a caliber on any kind of track or backroad
people underestimate the value of brute power. Road tracks have like what? 10-15 turns in them the rest of the 2-4 mile lap is straight away or "power" areas. yea you can hold a long sweeper 2 mph faster, but at the end of the straight ure goign 10-15mph slower
150whp msp vs a 260whp caliber on a road coarse is not even going to be close
no i just hate fanboi's. Credit should be given where its due. I start this s*** on every forum, just because i happen to own a ms3, doesnt mean im going to be quiet about topics like this.
i understang your point but you can also look at diff story but for the drag strip junkies like myself the srt in the end has a better platform to build from if that's what you want.
i understang your point but you can also look at tq and hp this way -
tq gets you off the line and hp keeps you going. the fact that stock it makes less tq and make more hp really is relavent...both cars in the 1/4 are very close in performance...autox = diff story but for the drag strip junkies like myself the srt in the end has a better platform to build from if that's what you want.
stock for stock, mod for mod your msp will get s*** on by a caliber on any kind of track or backroad
people underestimate the value of brute power. Road tracks have like what? 10-15 turns in them the rest of the 2-4 mile lap is straight away or "power" areas. yea you can hold a long sweeper 2 mph faster, but at the end of the straight ure goign 10-15mph slower
150whp msp vs a 260whp caliber on a road coarse is not even going to be close
(potkettleno i just hate fanboi's.