- :
- Denver, CO
At this stage I would just hope the Turbo trickles down to the lesser trims. Signatures are MSRPing close to $39k around here and not everyone is a fan of brown leather and wood trim. (barf)
At this stage I would just hope the Turbo trickles down to the lesser trims. Signatures are MSRPing close to $39k around here and not everyone is a fan of brown leather and wood trim. (barf)
I would love to see the turbo come down to the Touring. That's more my feeling on a price for a CX-5.Yeah, but honestly, you can get the CX-5 Signature for 35-36K and the wood so minimal you will wonder where it is. The brown leather is nice but I agree, I don't understand whey they don't give you the same options that they have in the Mazda 6. Makes no sense.
Re: addind Auto-CC. They simply had to. Every other car company has it... how are you NOT going to offer it? That's all it is. No slight at all to being the 'drivers car company'. Is there any car company that DOESN'T have this now?
If people say they want more handling options or color options, I would hope Mazda would respond to that. But I have not heard anybody (serious) about he handling of the CX5 (as compared to competition).
Does anyone know if Mazda realizes more profit from a loaded Signature vs a basic Sport? Or any other trim level comparisons of profit. Wondering if that would explain offering the turbo in only higher trim levels [like Subaru does/did].
This is definitely something they need soon.with that said,
when is Pano roof coming? you know Mazda has to plan for this now.
Yeah if I recall, the GT was the best selling trim (before they added GTR and Sig).From my experience,
manufacturers and dealers seem to always make more profit from a loaded vehicle.
But with that said, it's always more of a deal to get a car that comes loaded than adding the options individually.
Have you guys seen the brown leather? It's so dark that it could be mistaken for black.
I like it actually, makes it different.
Well I'm stopping at the dealer this week so I'll see in person. I've just seen pics online.I agree, the guys whining about the brown leather and wood trim probably haven't even seen the car in person. The brown leather looks more black and the wood trim blends in and is hardly noticeable. You have to look twice to even see it. Maybe they should have left it off.
Well I'm stopping at the dealer this week so I'll see in person. I've just seen pics online.
I would love to see the turbo come down to the Touring. That's more my feeling on a price for a CX-5.
I mean, I paid $25k for mine. $35-36k still not very appealing.
Sure... I mean faster is faster. But I can't get it in a Gen 1 package so there is less chance of me feeling less satisfied.Just be prepared to feel less satisfied with your car if you drive the turbo.
Just be prepared to feel less satisfied with your car if you drive the turbo.
I mean...is there that big of a price difference between turbo and none turbo 2.5L? Didn't think there was but don't remember.that would be good, but from a marketing standpoint,
trickling the turbo down to the touring trim wouldn't make the touring the affordable well packaged value that it is.
Mazda has to differentiate their premium models.
But with that said, MAYBE in the near future, who knows, the prev gen Cx-5 all had the 2.0 engines right and the whole line up was upgraded to the 2.5.
I mean...is there that big of a price difference between turbo and none turbo 2.5L? Didn't think there was but don't remember.
I mean...is there that big of a price difference between turbo and none turbo 2.5L? Didn't think there was but don't remember.