same range somewhat..
mazda
14.3 gal x 22mpg = 314 miles
porsche
19.8 gal x 17mpg = 336.6 miles
from what i can tell, you're still saving $$ with the cx-5 with slightly less range than the turbo.
that macan Turbo is sick!!!!
but so would filling up that bad boy every 2 days =P
I didn*t say anything about saving money at all. No intention too whatsoever... Saw different numbers than you as well, 19mpg est avg Macan, 24-24.5 avg CX-5. Anyways, personally think the CX-5 needs a little bigger gas tank. Go on and crucify me for it, it*s not a complaint, just an observation noted by numerous folks here as well... awd model has a smaller tank and less mpg, which doesn*t help, either.
Yes, the Macan S is sick!!! I too, would choose the GTR or Sig CX-5 over the RDX as well...
The Turbo is a beast like the top trim of the Stelvio, Mileage is not too bad in daily drive mode.
If I was real concerned about gas expense my list of consideration would be very different. Prius?
Ugh..... I hope not.
I talked to a Cayenne owner a few days ago. He is on his 3rd and has taken each over 100k with only regular maintenance. He said he never buys new. In Atlanta there are so many being leased that they are easy to find a year old for a decent price. A lot of Mercedes and Audi here as well.
I*m in no rush and really not attached to any particular brand of any product. I have owned the CX5 since 13 and only gripe now and then about sluggish acceleration. Sometimes it is fairly peppy for what it is. I plan on taking it over 100K before I buy something else. Plus, my positive blog write up on the 14 CX-5 has been the #3 most viewed post from viewers around the world.
We can all agree you will get a better bang on a used car due to not having to pay for depreciation.
with that said, some like myself, never considered a used car, i guess it's a mental thing...but yes you can get better than what a $34k mazda can offer if looking at other markets.
Another option is just wait for used 2.5T models to come to market and that same $34k car will be had for much less =)
i'm wondering if a bigger tank would yield lower mpg numbers because of the weight?
but either way, you'll get the longer range.
lottery ticket in hopes of winning so I can buy one of those performance SUV thingamajigs...(drive2)(silly)(outie)
Urus is butt ugly. Macan is just average ugly. Stelvio is the beaut.
Have you seen the Lambo Urus?
Supposedly it is the baddest ass of all bad ass SUVs. Gas stations need to be spaced no more than 10 miles apart but you*ll get there in a matter of seconds.
The super car YouTube reviewers drool over it. Just a lottery ticket away.
https://blog.dupontregistry.com/vid...la-model-x-p100d-results-in-new-world-record/
Just looked that up and have to admit the exterior styling is not bad.Urus is butt ugly. Macan is just average ugly. Stelvio is the beaut.
but every car i've owned that had memory seats worked with the power mirrors.
i'm surprised these 2 are not linked in the mazda is kind of a let down.
We can all agree you will get a better bang on a used car due to not having to pay for depreciation.
with that said, some like myself, never considered a used car, i guess it's a mental thing...but yes you can get better than what a $34k mazda can offer if looking at other markets.
Another option is just wait for used 2.5T models to come to market and that same $34k car will be had for much less =)
Neighbors son has a Bentley Bentayga and parks it in front of my house. I almost poop my pants when I walk outside. Told
Him I*d wash it for him if he let me dry it off by driving it. At least he chuckled...lol
Whoa....has he let you ride in it at least? I will probably never see one of those in person.
There is a guy in the Charleston area that has one. Looks very much pimped out. Kinda ugly actually.
Whoa....has he let you ride in it at least? I will probably never see one of those in person.