RAAZ227 said:
So what if we were to get rid of post counts and go to ranks, would we have to start from scratch or just convert the post to rank?
Wow...too many good points in this thread to quote...
I'll start with this one...How would the ranking be done? Look at it this way. I'm well under 1,500 posts, but I don't recall getting flamed much at all, if ever. Mattew on the other hand has about 5,500 posts, but gets flamed sometimes too. I still think he does WAY more good for the forum than bad, so how would I rank against him?? We both joined in January 2003.
I don't like the ranking idea.
The only reason I don't like the seller rating REPLACING the postcount is that that would become the new measure to judge people by. Let's just say I sold 100 things on here and had a 100% seller rating. If someone that has more knowledge than me about engine performance has a zero rating, who would you trust more to give you advice on an engine? Doesn't make sense does it?
Regarding people with low post counts and longtime memberships...I don't trust them. Just because you SAY you are on here reading stuff all the time doesn't mean I'll take advice when you pop up to give it. Reading info does you no good if you can't recite it. Part of gaining people's trust(in your knowledge), like Matthew said, IS participating in everyday conversations on the board. The more you post, the better people can get a feel for how you act/react to others, and how relevant your answers are.
I say leave the post count how it is. If you want to know about someone's seller rating, use the sticky in the GroupBuy/For Sale section, that's why it's there...
http://www.msprotege.com/vbb225/showthread.php?s=&threadid=29858
If you choose not to leave a reply(feedback), then you are keeping other members in the dark about whether a fellow member can be trusted or not. It's as simple as that.
Sorry for the long reply, but i wanted to touch on all those points.
