Well then, better put the RX-7's and RX-8 on the *** list as well...KpaBap said:Miatas are gay, only fags and dykes would want double wishbones on all four corners and almost perfect 50/50 weight distribution in a 2300 lbs RWD car.
![]()
Well then, better put the RX-7's and RX-8 on the *** list as well...KpaBap said:Miatas are gay, only fags and dykes would want double wishbones on all four corners and almost perfect 50/50 weight distribution in a 2300 lbs RWD car.
![]()
Well put. My father falls into that demograph in a way, but also doesn't. We're asian immigrants, and my father lived in the Philippines, Japan, and Hong Kong, where he was introduced to rotaries by the RX-3. We moved to the states, and he bought a 280ZX I think? and traded it in for the FC when it came out. I inherited that car from him when he bought his FD, and I again inherited that one, which as we speak sits in the garage uninsured...that's a total different story, but let's just say I can't get insured on it. I take it out alot, but my Dad comes by and takes it from me once a week or so. We've never had a problem with our RX-7's because, well my father is pretty good with rotaries....but I do know that FC3S boy's shop is a good one...I've been turned onto them by a few friends. But it is true, every other 7 owner I've met has been pretty snobby. I just wish I could really call the FD "mine"...but as it stands, I can't afford insurance on the damn thing. Progressive is funny, they classify the FD as some sort of high class sports car, but the RX-8 is priced due to its 1.3...eh whatever, at least I can afford to insure it.SpicyMchaggis said:To be honest, I hate about 98% of RX7 owners. I know exactly how they got the "reputation" they have today. When the turboII's came out the customer demographic was the a-typical middle-aged caucasion male. As for the N/A model, it was you guessed it, the A-typical middle-class cacausion female. Now this was the trend for quite a while. The demographic slightly changed however as the FD was introduced. It wasn't quite as affordable as before. The profile was bumped up to the white collar class and again, the same cacausion males. Here's the problem with the situation. It was deemd the "mid-life crisis sports car" by Road and Track in the first months of introduction. Thats exactly what it was. Sure it might be a dominant force in circuit racing in japan (which by the way it still is) but here in the states, it was the slicked back hair mobile for every schmuck in a suit trying to get laid. The two turbos being directly connected to their egos. Here's where the reputation got started for the FD being labeled a Lemon. A lot of these white bread idiots thought it would be a good idea to "attempt" to drive these cars the way they are designed to be driven. Constant abuse and mistreatment always leads to problems, but thats not where it came from. It was the used car market. Aside from the obvious oil pressure problems that the early 90's FD's had, the used car market was flooded with low mileage FD's that all "seemed" to be in great shape. However, they had quite a hellish break in period. So now you have the better part of 50% of the FD's sold in their first years already being sold off privately. Now, all the hardball penny pinchers are buying up the "nice looking" FD's and becoming furious when they discover extensive costs for rebuilds and service. The first thing they think is that "Well what the ****? I bought it from a dealership and I'm having all these problems!" Which is what anyone would think right? The real problem was the lack of service support from the dealerships. The rotary technology hadn't caught on. Hell, it still hasn't. I'm sure you know how hard it is to find a "good" rotary shop locally. So to recap, by the mid-90's we have more than half of the FD's made, already being sold off to dealerships for what you ask? Mid-size sedans. But thats a whole different issue. So where is all of this going? I have no idea, but I will say this, and ironic as it might be, the legend of the rotaries reliability stem from nothing more than misinformation or a lack there of. I love rotaries, I always have and it really is a tragedy that here in the states, the general public took probably the best sports car ever created and turned it into a trite dick mobile that has a story to tell behind every nick in the paint. If the car was only marketed as a true sports car instead of a "buy me an look cool mobile". God damn early 90's..
Sorry had to go pee...It's great to see that you appreciate rotaries though....but for future info, it's good to refer to sites like this one:SpicyMchaggis said:I left a hell of a comment there and I get no response?
I thought I read about someone doing this successfully? You'd know more about that than I do, but I thought I saw this in one of the mags...KpaBap said:Aww so cute...
see we CAN all get along....
and for the record ---- rotary + miata > *
now only if that pesky firewall wasn't in the way![]()
If you get the "10 best issue" of car and driver, on page 42 there's a paragraph of Japan lifting the 276 horsepower bar. Check it out...it's a pretty interesting piece of info to think about...It reads in part "Mazda will introduce a 300-hp two-seat RX-7"SpicyMchaggis said:It's funny that the japanese car market JUST NOW marketed a car rated at over 300hp. I believe it was an acura RL? It's funny because look at the cars we're talking about here. Skylines, RX7's, Supra's, etc..None of them rated over 300hp. I say this all the time, and I'll say it once more..Drag racing is lame.
True, but maybe it would be cool to see an MX-5, and a "rotary roadster" or something to that effect...KpaBap said:I can guarantee you with 99.99% certainty Mazda will never make a rotary Miata, it wouldn't make any sense. It would undercut the RX line.
Oh god, don't even get me started...I like the cars, but come on, if you had a choice? Get the savannah model...KpaBap said:Well there are always the oh-so-nice convertible FCs![]()