Honestly i don't see the difference between having non-hid fog or "driving" lamps on vs the newer LED DRL's that most imports are sporting. (mostly owing to the EU requirement for them)
i would rather pay the cost of the aux lamp vs the replacement cost of my dipped-beam lamp.
if it makes the OP feel safer knowing that their car is more likely to be visible, then why argue with their intentions?
would i get called a fart-can-modder if i retrofit an LED strip into my headlights to acomplish the same thing? (i might get a few comments about how i should have bought an Audi instead, and then people would reply that Mazda should have integrated them etc etc Ad Infinitum)
thank you for the mod link btw. /thumbsup
food for both sides:
"The original reason for the use of Daytime Running Lights (DRL) was not
the improvement of vehicle visibility. The use of DRL seems to have
originated in 1961 as a campaign to operate motor vehicles with headlights
on in daytime as a signal of the intention to comply with a Texas governor's
request to drive safely. Also at that time, to quote a remark made by
investigators of a DRL effect in the early sixties: `It seems that no one can
conceive of an automobile or a Greyhound Bus being invisible on a bright
clear day'. This view is applicable to most road users even today.
Research methods and conclusions
DRL as a road safety measure is often difficult to understand for the road
user because he or she `knows' that with sufficient attention every road user
can be seen in daylight. Nevertheless, the research reviewed shows that
visual perception in daytime traffic is far from perfect and it is worse in
conditions of low ambient illumination. In a striking example 8% of cars in
an open field in broad daylight were not visible from relevant distances
without the use of DRL. On shady roads or those with backgrounds which
mask objects in the foreground the visibility and contrast of cars in popular
colours is greatly reduced.
It is known from in-depth accident studies that failing to see another road
user in time (or at all) is a contributing factor in 50% of all daytime
accidents and for daytime intersection accidents this increases to as much as
80%.
The psychological research reviewed shows that DRL does not only
improve the visibility of motor vehicles in daytime, but also influences the
timely peripheral perception of vehicles making conflicting movements.
Moreover, cars with DRL are better identified as cars and their distances are
estimated more safely compared to cars without DRL. All this contributes to
the expectation that DRL has positive safety effects, especially in conditions
of low ambient illumination."
The Safety Effects of Daytime Running Lights
Matthijs Koornstra, Frits Bijleveld & Marjan Hagenzieker
Leidschendam, 1997
SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, The Netherlands