rodslinger
Member
I hope it comes with an iron for the wrinkles on the sides...ugh. Otherwise it looks good...
Agreed. I like the changes but prefer the clean side of the current model.
I hope it comes with an iron for the wrinkles on the sides...ugh. Otherwise it looks good...
I sure wouldn't want to be the 7th passenger!
Really, most of the so-call 7 passenger cars in the size the 5 is in, are meaning small children. Trying to cram 7 6' tall adults into the 5 would be criminal.
I'm somewhat torn between my head (Mazda5) and my heart (Mazdaspeed3) - both nearly the same dollars, etc etc. This makes it no easier. Now, if they would make a Mazdaspeed5 I'd be writing the check tomorrow....![]()
Give me back the Touring with MT!!!!! (drive)
P5w3kids, the Asian and European 5 have 2+3+2 configuration, the problem is that the 3rd seat in the 2nd row was fold-in-fold-out style and they were unable to get it approved for North America.
Actually I think it's fundamentally similar to the karakuri, I think the main issue with the karakuri was that the seatbelt was fixed to the seats, not the frame.
I figured it was Mazda thinking we're too fat (or to avoid hearing the complaints of 'it's too small!' )in the US Mazda5 (current model) the passenger side middle seat folds out a console with cup holders, and the driver side middle seat only has a storage cubby. on the JDM Mazda5, the drivers side (left hand side) middle seat folds out the third middle seat. however, i can see that our fat USDM butts would never fit a middle third seat. it would be nice to have a little more seating room, but the 5 is so small that i dont see it being very useful.