Mazda3 vs 2005 Impreza 2.5RS

Mazda 3s vs 2005 Impreza 2.5RS

What do you guys think? To me it seems like their performance is similar.

Subaru Impreza
2.5 L
165 hp @ 5600
155 lb-ft @ 4000
AWD
2965lb curb weight

Mazda 3s
2.3 L
160 hp @ 6500
150 lb-ft @ 4500
FWD
2762lb curb weight

Does anyone know the weight distribution of any of them? What about other considerations besides performance?
 
Last edited:
Before buying the Mazda3 I test drove a bunch of cars such including the Impreza TS and RS, Corolla, Civic. My second favorite behind what I got was the Impreza. It didn't feel quite as quick or handle quite as well as the Mazda3 but it seemed like a definite step up from the others. Maybe I was having a hard time being objective though because I really wanted the Mazda3 more than everything else.

Weight distribution for the Impreza is 59/41 for the Mazda3 is 62/38 I think.

Other factors for me were I could get the 3 with side air bags and a moonroof, but I couldn't get the Impreza with that. If you get the side air bags with the 3 you also have to get ABS, in the Impreza ABS is standard. I like the 17in allows that come with the 5dr (opt. on 4 dr) a lot.

As far as inside/outside looks go I liked the 3 but don't take my word for check both cars out and decide that one yourself. Really I'd say the same thing for performance as well. Take both cars out for a long test drive w/out any salespeople in your car and see what you think yourself.

As far as reliability, what djcg posted looks scary. I was surprised to see that cause I've heard a lot of good things about Subaru as far as reliability (know a lot of people with them too because there were a ton of them where I use to live). The Focus is up there high on the list, but supposedly it is a lot better now than when it first came out. It was hard to tell from that list what years the Impreza was bad or if it was bad every single year -- that's important to know since it's been out a long time. The Mazda3's reliability is unkown at this point of course. A lot of people tell me it should be good since it's built in Japan but I had a Camry that was about 6 years old for a year and I had more troulbe with it than I had with a 15+ year old Volvo 240 for 4 years and the Volvo had more miles.
 
MazdaDryvr said:
Interesting that there are no Mazdas at all on that list. And people call Mazda a 2nd rate car manufacturer.

yea, i didnt even think of getting a mazda until a couple of months before my purchase.

i was gonna be a geek and get the 2004 Prius cos it had so many gadgets and was ultra high tech.... but i couldnt bear driving an auto.... then i saw the mz3 and the rest is history.
 

New Threads and Articles

Back