elderlycoffee said:*sigh* I think ethically a Judge would have to rule otherwise...
Maybe I'm getting my hopes high but every person I've talked to period says it should be an in and out sort of thing IF IF IF IF IF it goes to court.
Speaking purely hypothetically, and not regarding any particular legal matter, the lack of a Monroney statute issue doesn't mean a hypothetical car manufacturer or hypothetical dealer doesn't have any legal obligation to live up to its representations, written or otherwise. Maybe, just maybe, there is a contract law issue when someone relies on written representations that may or may not be part of a contract. I'm not a contracts lawyer, but I think I could play one on TV if I had a good script. I heard somewhere that the first rule in contracts law is to actually look at the contract. I just looked at what I have. It's a preprinted Motor Vehicle Buyers Order which near the bottom says that the window sticker is a part of the contract and overides any contrary provisions on the contract of sale.
Given that, in my case I'm ready to move onto damages. And if I was on TV, say the People's Court, I would argue that my damages are the cost of the Bose components or equivalent purchased from Mazda or somewhere plus installation, minus the market value of my current system minus uninstall costs. Case closed, Judge Wapner bangs the gavel.
Last edited: