SkyActiv-X SPCCI is using compression ignition and spark ignition alternatively like a hybrid switching between electrical motor and gasoline engine. See this Driving Mazda's Next Mazda 3 with Its Skyactiv-X Compression-Ignition Gas Engine article from Car and Driver:They use it to get the necessary pressure to reliably ignite so my statement is true that they are wanting it to ignite from compression. Remember originally they were not going to use a spark plug at all but had to add it. Maybe if lower octanes were readily available......
Car and Driver said:We had assumed the Xs zeal might sag during CI operation, with deadened responses like those felt in hybrids that can briefly run solely on their relatively weak electric motors. That does not seem to be the case, and the engine is relatively tractable running under compression ignition. Should your acceleration needs outpace CIs operating parameters, the X switches to conventional spark ignition, the faintest hint of supercharger whine dancing among engine noises familiar to anyone who has driven a four-cylinder Mazda recently. Even under compression ignition, the engine is smooth and quiet; the engine behaves so similarly in each ignition state that it takes concentration to detect which one is in play. Traverse a smooth road at lower speeds in CI mode and listen closely enough, and you can just make out a diesel-like prattle. At higher speeds or on coarse road surfaces, youll never detect it.
SkyActiv-X SPCCI is using compression ignition and spark ignition alternatively like a hybrid switching between electrical motor and gasoline engine. See this Driving Mazda's Next Mazda 3 with Its Skyactiv-X Compression-Ignition Gas Engine article from Car and Driver:
Can't access the article as I'm in the UK, "Sorry, this content is not available in your region." Bloody GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) Yrwei52, please could you copy and paste the article so that us EU mere mortals can read it? - So much for net neutrality...
I use to think that way as well, about paddle shifters in cars with CVT. However the one in the Accord Sport is actually useful if you know how to use it or what it is for. In cars with traditional automatic transmissions or DCTs, the paddle shifters simply allow you to change gear, up or down, pretty simple. In the Accord Sport, the paddle shifters allow you to select a different ratio that will give you more power or allow engine braking. That's the complicated answer, but I found a different, albeit simpler way to look at it. The paddle shifters in the Accord Sport allow you to select a higher RPM limit. Basically in my experience, driving it in D mode, the RPMs seem to be capped at like 4000 RPM even when you go WOT. This was most likely done in the interest of fuel economy. Using the paddle shifters to downshift allows the engine to rev up past 4000 RPM, which means you get more power, because in the 2015 Accord with the 2.4 NA engine, max power is at like 6500 RPM..
I also find it highly amusing to see paddle shifters on a car that has a CVT. Shifting your own gears in a car that doesn't have any (gears, that is).
It also amuses me just how hard car manufacturers try to program their CVT's to mimic a traditional torque converter automatic transmission. Fake shift points, etc.
If the CVT is that great, why are they trying so hard to make it pretend it's not a CVT? I know, it's because CVT's suck.
SkyActiv-X SPCCI is using compression ignition and spark ignition alternatively like a hybrid switching between electrical motor and gasoline engine. See this Driving Mazda's Next Mazda 3 with Its Skyactiv-X Compression-Ignition Gas Engine article from Car and Driver:
Read the article posted above. They aren’t using the spark plug in the same way. They ignite small fuel ball which raises the pressure causing the rest of the cylinder to spontaneously combust. That’s why it’s called spark controlled compression ignition not spark ignition.
They also aren't using the supercharger the same way other engines do as well.
We’re getting into semantics here about compression ignition and spark ignition. As in Car and Driver article, they even using the term “switches to conventional spark ignition”, and “behaves so similarly in each ignition state” means two different processing states going on for ignition. So by saying the lower octane on gasoline the better for SkySctiv-X SPCCI earlier is not true because the spark ignition is also involved.Exactly, this engine is designed for efficiency not performance. And they’re using a lot of existing technology in novel ways.
Thanks for making those imagines on the article! (drinks)Here you go
HCCI is good for simplicity and efficiency. Mazda now keeps adding more devices such as ignition system and supercharger making the SkyActiv-X SPCCI very complicated. Not the way I would like to see on SkyActiv-II development several years ago.
We’re getting into semantics here about compression ignition and spark ignition. As in Car and Driver article, they even using the term “switches to conventional spark ignition”, and “behaves so similarly in each ignition state” means two different processing states going on for ignition. So by saying the lower octane on gasoline the better for SkySctiv-X SPCCI earlier is not true because the spark ignition is also involved.
HCCI is good for simplicity and efficiency. Mazda now keeps adding more devices such as ignition system and supercharger making the SkyActiv-X SPCCI very complicated. Not the way I would like to see on SkyActiv-II development several years ago.
Thanks for making those imagines on the article! (drinks)
And why you can view it in Australia but Jonno21 cant view it in UK? (uhm)
Thanks for making those imagines on the article! (drinks)
And why you can view it in Australia but Jonno21 can’t view it in UK? (uhm)
Thanks xeler8ing for the mag site extract No thanks button on this site (there should be one)