jayka said:
All my friends say Kicker makes the best sub and so does Rockford Fosgate. They told me JL makes deep sound but it needs more RMS, while Kicker are deep with a low RMS. Is that ture that Kicker is better than JL?
And another question. The RMS for JL 12w0 is only 125W, but can I give it 200W each? Will it blow the subs?
From what I understand, more wattage gives more power and deeper sound. If it's not right, gimme some correct info guys
Ok heres what you do:
1) Go get a six pack of beer
2) Go to your friends house
3) Say, " hey i got a 6 pack".
4) when he is nice and happy about the gift, KICK HIM IN THE NUTS AS HARD AS YOU CAN!
5) Tell him thats for being a ****-tard and hit him with a bottle.
(rofl)
That was all basicly backwards.
Kicker, Rockford, and JL all have different sub lines. Comparing the companies in general over power ratings is pointless. Although they are all very simialr at the top.
JL rates their power handling more conservatively. Kicker and RF exagerate there handling numbers as the amps that mate to their subs are also typicaly over rated.
The JLs are a more acousticly accurate subs and kicker and RF are very much more about volume.
For the price the JL W0 is untouchable in my mind. Especialy by a kicker comp or RF HE. Also keep in mind Kickers subs sits in the middle of the JL and fosgate lines. Like the kicker comp VR is $150 and the JLW3 is $200 as is the RF HE2. Again hard to compare becuase of that.
A sub doesn't go lower based on the power it is given. The dynamics of that sub and the box it is put in makes that decision.
The JLW0s can easily take a real and undistorted 200 watts rms. Its distortion and a sitty box that will hurt them.
Of coarse more watts gives more power, watts are the unit of power. If you mean more power gives more volume then, yes you are correct. However, you must double the power to gain even 3db. Again, deeper sound is not a product of power, although a bad amp throwing distortion will not sound as clean when playing deep notes.