Haha, yeah man...You remember back in the early 80's what Bridgestone was marketing?...I was just a tiny dude then, but I still remember the commercials about that golfer running the commercials that advertised a "Performance tire that will change the tire industry forever"...They claimed "Flexible sidewalls that grip the pavement"...After a few more years of development, they quickly realize they were a bit off, and those types of commercials are not on anymore...twilightprotege said:back in the 70's F1 cars did drift through corners...but then they spent lots of time and money developing better rubber for the tires and there was then no reason to drift anymore
hmmm, good question. If there was any TS, can't be much because the rear still gets the majority of the power.eting_pro5 said:Torque Steer Question- Do AWD cars suffer from torque steer at all? It seems to me like they would because the wheels that are turning are getting some power.
This depends entirely on the layout of the AWD system...An Audi TT Quattro does not send that much power rearward, for the most part the system can be regarded as mostly FWD...on the other hand an R34 Skyline sends almost all the torque to the rear wheels until traction is compensated, and then routes it to the front to get things moving...03MSP said:hmmm, good question. If there was any TS, can't be much because the rear still gets the majority of the power.
Yes... that was what I meantZoomZoomH said:i assume you meant RWD...
actually, FR is the more 'natural' setup for sporting driving, as it is much easier to achieve perfect 50/50 weight distribution in FR than it is with MR.pr5owner said:honda tried to make the prelude handle better by adding ATTS, maybe we should ghetto something together to simulate that, but we all know we are pwned by MR
(werd)ZoomZoomH said:...MR cars can be driven very fast (see Porsche), but they are tricky to control under that kind of speed.