ok, a ton of people are using this hydrolock scenario as an argument against a cold air intake. There are several reasons why this is really not a concern at all, and I just wanted to quell this little witch hunt with the facts.
To create a hydrolock situation, you need more than just a spash of water on your intake. not only is it extremely unlikely that water will be sucked UP through the intake, but after going through the turbo, it will almost certainly evaporate completely. I'm no expert, but I'm almost certain that small amounts of water vapor will not be enough to lock an engine, as GASSES compress.
Also, the air intake draws from the left side of the vehicle, which is the wrong side if you want to get tons of water in there. Roads are crowned so that rain runs off to the right side of the road and then drains.
I've had cars with cold air on both sides, and I've lived in some of the rainiest places in the US (if you know about rain storms in Texas, Louisiana, and Florida, you know what I'm talking about), and I've never had a problem with water induction.
just my dos centavos.
To create a hydrolock situation, you need more than just a spash of water on your intake. not only is it extremely unlikely that water will be sucked UP through the intake, but after going through the turbo, it will almost certainly evaporate completely. I'm no expert, but I'm almost certain that small amounts of water vapor will not be enough to lock an engine, as GASSES compress.
Also, the air intake draws from the left side of the vehicle, which is the wrong side if you want to get tons of water in there. Roads are crowned so that rain runs off to the right side of the road and then drains.
I've had cars with cold air on both sides, and I've lived in some of the rainiest places in the US (if you know about rain storms in Texas, Louisiana, and Florida, you know what I'm talking about), and I've never had a problem with water induction.
just my dos centavos.