DiS said:all i gotta say is that michelin is waaaaaaaaaaay overpriced and doesn't perform as good as bridgstone blizzaks on snow/ice. Michelin doesn't even come close to compare. (its pos in my opinion). All you're paying is for the name brand of michelin, which is 60-80 bucks more than for any other tire out there. RIP OFF!
But yea I have bridgestone blizzaks and they are amazing in snow. I thought I'd get stuck in few deep snow spots (considering that my car is lowered) and NO PROBLEM whatsoever. Mind you, blizzaks wear out very very VERY fast on dry surface (trust me I still drive on them since last winter.....long story dont ask)
Only front will keep the grip in straight line, but the rear won't follow when you turn... My opinion is that you need all four tires... Since you need to turn sometimes...maskedSONY said:For those of you who got snows, did you get them for all fours or just on the front?
DiS said:all i gotta say is that michelin is waaaaaaaaaaay overpriced and doesn't perform as good as bridgstone blizzaks on snow/ice. Michelin doesn't even come close to compare. (its pos in my opinion). All you're paying is for the name brand of michelin, which is 60-80 bucks more than for any other tire out there. RIP OFF!
But yea I have bridgestone blizzaks and they are amazing in snow. I thought I'd get stuck in few deep snow spots (considering that my car is lowered) and NO PROBLEM whatsoever. Mind you, blizzaks wear out very very VERY fast on dry surface (trust me I still drive on them since last winter.....long story dont ask)
maskedSONY said:For those of you who got snows, did you get them for all fours or just on the front?
maskedSONY said:Ok, snow tires for the stock tire size sell for stupid prices.
Does anybody know what the lug nut pattern size is for a 2001 ES 2.0? I want to get some steel wheels for my protege, and give her some heavy duty snows.