FYI Front Brake Pad images NA CX-5

2020 CX-5 GT -NA engine

Replaced front pads and rotors in July. Used the Mazda factory installed type pads made in Japan p/n K0Y1-3328ZB, and NOT the value line -- my buddy is a Detroit Three-employed high performance brakes engineer and emphasizes the great degree of engineering that goes into spec'ing pads from Tier 1 suppliers, so encourages this approach of sticking with the matching OEM pad and I trust his insight balanced against his also not wanting to overpay and waste money. I always seek pads at discount off full list even ordering online if needed. Went with POWER STOP rotors JBR1745EVC from Rockauto because he agrees quality units work fine, they cost about half of Mazda's, and these are very nicely fully coated for our MI climate.

YMMV, but it turned out just perfectly with nothing untoward or unusual, just all refreshed full stopping power. Incidentally, the rears got done a few months prior, so maybe 35,000 on those and 37,000 on these--the original fronts accidentally went too far, oops, were way overdue for new parts. Car is not driven aggressively, 60% miles were long, flat highway slogs.

Here's what the factory spec pads look like, obviously made by Akebono but that does not mean that other Akebono pads are exactly the same since the OEMs often get custom crafted variants from these Tier 1 suppliers, in line with how my hi-po brakes engineer bestie does it for his own programs.

Posting here with nothing revelatory, only because I get so many useful tips on stuff like this that it's nice just to share something every so often.

PXL_20250710_135724246.MP.webp


PXL_20250710_150503665.MP.webp
 
Last edited:
nothing wrong with OEM pads, but they're not spectacular either.. they're just good enough for most driving conditions and most people... quite unoffensive pads: no noise, low dust, soft initial bite and takes a lot of heating up before they start to really work well (but not phenomenal... a better street performance brake pad would've stopped just as good at lower temperatures without risking rotor warpage)... I was a fan of OEM pads until I found better JDM performance pads that are (stops) better but still relatively unoffensive/annoyance free: low noise, low dust, non-metallic non-asbestos but not certified copper free... so, I'm never getting OEM pads for my mazdas again

these pads might be a different compound than your original pads... ever since 4 years ago, california has required brake pads to be copper free, so for parts inventory simplification purposes, no one makes a "california only" brake pad and a "49 state" brake pad

the european version are high dust, higher performance pads... different market expectations lol

but if you wanted it done right, I would've replaced the shims and clips, as stated in the shop manual... you can find the OEM ones cheap off ebay

powerstop rotors have good reputation, but I would've gotten advics instead, which are high carbon compared to the other brands and even OEM... they're also fully coated despite what rock auto says... I confirmed this with my own eyes on a set I just bought a couple of weeks ago... the price for them are pretty cheap and might be the best non-slotted or drilled rotors you can get... they seem to be high demand or low stock or some reason because I had to wait for them to go back in stock, and then they were selling out quick once they were back in stock
 
Last edited:
also the 1st gen CX-5s also uses the same brake pads and calipers setup.. the 2016 went to use the same vented hat design like the 2nd gens do and are an upgrade as they're the same size

so, I suggest renaming the thread title to cover those years too
 
Your initial reply states that you got better JDM performance pads, then you show a pic of EDM pads by Ferodo. Did you try those two different markets' pads, that is before moving beyond both those and the US options? Just clarifying, thanks.
 
Your initial reply states that you got better JDM performance pads, then you show a pic of EDM pads by Ferodo. Did you try those two different markets' pads, that is before moving beyond both those and the US options? Just clarifying, thanks.
Those are aftermarket pads (for CX-5) I'm referring to:
IMG_8817.webp

IMG_8818.webp

IMG_8816.webp

IMG_8819.webp


They just came out less than 3 months ago, so not many reviews for them. But so far, positive reviews. These are "heavy weight" (what the "HW" means) meant for big cars. I already have the "regular" version on my Protege and they stop about the same as stock when cold, but it doesn't take long to heat them up and once they do, they can give you a whiplash or lock them up if you stand on the pedal... something that you had to really try hard to do with stock brake pads

I got them for about the same price as real Mazda pads (not the "Value" line crap) before the tariffs hit. I still need to put them on, but I haven't had time and I don't desperately need to replace what's on the car yet


But back to Mazda pads... I was wrong about what you posted as copper-free pads. Those are low copper pads for the 2013 to 2020. Mazda had the pads reformulated in 2021 to comply with California regulations with fully copper free pads. They're the same shape and fits older CX-5s just fine. The EDM CX-5s continue to use the Ferodo pads I posted before, not these copper free pads used in the US and rest of the world
KGY03328Z-Pastilla-Del-CX5.jpg

You will also see that the DOT pad friction codes for these copper free pads are "FG", so theoretically, they're better than the 2013-2020 pads (those are "FF"), but it's so hard to say these days without testing them:
KGY03328Z-1.jpg


The rear pads are the same worldwide, but there's still a lining difference between the 2016-2020 and 2021-2025:
2016-2020 "low copper" pads (early year pads might be Japanese made, instead of Chinese made in the revised "A" pads):
Klocki-hamulcowe-tyl-OE-MAZDA-CX-5-KAY02648Z

2021-2025 "copper free" pads:
KBY62648Z.jpg

Again, the trend of "better" friction material continues with the copper free pads. They have DOT codes "HH" instead of "FG" in the earlier pads. They are interchangeable between the years

The early 1st gens (2013-2015) have no EPB but a traditional cable one. So, the calipers and pads are completely different, but still the same worldwide:
20220715132310-6568.jpg

They are marked friction code "FF", so theoretically they're a lower performance pad than the newer CX-5s with the EPB rear brakes. The pad sizes are also slightly smaller.

As far as stopping power, noise, and dust, everything could be better or worse depending on what aftermarket pad you choose.
 
The Turbo brakes (same as CX-9) must be different because I had a brake dust problem before I switched them to ceramics.
Of course they are. Bigger/different brake pads, bigger dual piston calipers, and bigger rotors. I wouldn't have expected the offensive dust on the USDM turbo models, but it doesn't surprise me either lol
 

New Threads and Articles

Back