For the thinkers out there...

[GNsPR5]

wow i like the way you think... yes.. in theory.. but the " wall" would ultimately be consumed by the "black " yes?

Roger Waters might argue that last statement.

 

[Siccnes]

but then again, we used to think atoms were the end all...but then we gave them speed..and they turned into quarks...*shrugs*

 

[orphman]

Roger Waters might argue that last statement.

hahahah that was good!

 

[orphman]

but then again, we used to think atoms were the end all...but then we gave them speed..and they turned into quarks...*shrugs*

... ehh well if nothing better than thinking comes form this im happy but a semi conclusive answer would be great!

let me call up stephen hawkings lol... he'd have something for me im sure.. lol

 

[Siccnes]

I would have to say I'd place my bets on the speeding black hole..versus ginormous wall.

 

[GNsPR5]

sort of...light travels at a constant speed in a vacuum, so you can use the distance traveled by light in a specific time as a measurement of distance - thus, "light year" as a distance.

would be similar to saying "i traveled 4 hours from my house yesterday." that sould mean 10ft, but it could also mean 240miles, it all depends on how fast you travel. since car travel speed isn't constant, it doesn't make much sense. but since light speed is pretty close to constnat, "light year" does make sense.

O.K. we have debated the speed of light....so what's the speed of dark?

 

[Siccnes]

what if the speeding black hole passed through the ginormous wall like protons through gold foil?

 

[Siccnes]

or was it electrons? maybe it was electrons..

 

[GNsPR5]

what if the speeding black hole passed through the ginormous wall like protons through gold foil?

Only if said Speeding black hole flashed his high-beams first...but then the light would refract upon itself I guess...actually the light would remain at the same speed as the black hole, but would not project beyond it...am I right?

 

[orphman]

Only if said Speeding black hole flashed his high-beams first...but then the light would refract upon itself I guess...actually the light would remain at the same speed as the black hole, but would not project beyond it...am I right?

the light would then return to the black... it would be pulled back in... to date it is determend nothing can escape its force unless beyond that force... so maybe if projected beyond its "grasp" it would escape

 

[Siccnes]

Only if said Speeding black hole flashed his high-beams first...but then the light would refract upon itself I guess...actually the light would remain at the same speed as the black hole, but would not project beyond it...am I right?

ha..i think that was another one of those questions...but there is no light given off by a black hole..because it's so dense it sucks that in too. it was positively charged helium ions...protons...

 

[orphman]

ha..i think that was another one of those questions...but there is no light given off by a black hole..because it's so dense it sucks that in too. it was positively charged helium ions...protons...

agreed

 

[GNsPR5]

which brings up the question..an object traveling at or near the speed of light that has a light source, does the light source project beyond the object itself?

(thought)


Good conversation...time to leave work now.

(wishing my speed3 could do the speed of light)

 

[orphman]

which brings up the question..an object traveling at or near the speed of light that has a light source, does the light source project beyond the object itself?(thought)

i dunno thats another good one.. i would assum at teh speed of light.. no.. near yes...

 

[Mr. Win]

I would argue that the present is the only thing that exists and is all that you can control.

 

[jersey_emt]

As per the unstoppable force meeting an unmovable object, 'unstoppable' does not mean 'undeflectable'. My guess would be the force would be reflected by the unstoppable object, like light hitting a mirror.

 

[ProtoType5]

#1----Your computer screen and everything you perceive around you is, in terms of physics and pysiological science, the PAST...something that has happened already and is being broadcast to your sensory uptake system via light waves, sound waves, etc....and then is processed by the brain through nero-electrical signals....So everything that is, has already been....

#2----Black Hole trumps all in terms of walls, light, etc...the immense gravitational field it creates breaks all matter...even lightwaves into subatomic particles...

#3----And you cannot control the present, cause the wheels are already in motion and it already happened...You can, however, alter the future...

#4----An object traveling at light speed has infinite mass and infinite gravity...So nothing could exist to emit light...but, theoretically if it was just under the speed of light and you emitted something to a level faster than light......theoretically the emitted particles would be moving back in time..(boom05)

 

[Mr. Win]

How can you possibly alter the future if you have no control over the present?

 

[ProtoType5]

Because the present has actually already happened..You can only alter the future, which in turn gives you the feeling of controling the now...

 

[Mr. Win]

In that case are you saying we live in the future?