Why is everyone set on the phrase: "Im not going to spend the extra $9k-$12k on an evo or sti, for only a 20-30hp difference." I am coming from a 06 evo 9 mr with around a couple grand into it in mods and it was probably the wildest car to drive. The reason I think we should hinder away from that phrase is because, not everyone likes the appeal, shape, design, of our speed 3s, but they all say the same thing, its a great bang for your buck as some would say. People just dont spend that extra couple grand for a few more ponies, they spend it on a product that has a history behind it, an as far as the evo vs sti discussion goes, this battle has been going on longer than some of us have been alive. I just feel both the new and old versions of both cars we great in its time and will continue to battle for supremecy. As for the speed 3? I love my car, thats the reason I traded my evo 9 in, for reasons of the hatchback, cause i store tons of stuff an play hockey, i live in hawaii, and theres no track and or need of all wheel drive, now if there was a track, I would still have it. Everyone has there reasons on why they like either or, the fact is if your posting in a mazdaspeed 3 thread, chances are you made your choice being price, power, or looks, who knows. All I can say is I am favoring the new sti because the same reasons why I got the 3, hatch, power, comfort and performance.
An just to finish it, just say you do add up what you really get for the $5k-$8k in price between our cars?
More discplacement
20-30hp <only? this being stock ovcourse>
BBS rims
Brembo brakes
recaro seats
Tremec close ratio 6spd trans
HIDS< come on our gt models>
Oh and ALL WHEEL DRIVE
COBB, COBB and COBB