my lights arent high at all. i actaully think they can be adjusted atlittle higher which i will do when i feel like pulling off my bumper again
as i said, IMO the GT isnt worth it b/c the blose system i would have pulled out b/c its not good enough quality. which means my radio as well so thats the fuel computer taken out. i would have upgradeds the factory HIDs b/c they are bright enough for my liking, the leather seats are nice. but i hate cold seats when its cold or hot seats when its hot.
i dont want anyone scratching or puncturing the leather.
so the only thing i want off the GT are the LED tail lights
I'll just say this, I went (and I think many others did too) with the GT over the Sport not because the HIDs or the Bose were the best available because if that were the case Mazda wouldnt have been a good choice. The GT package mirrors the general "bang for your buck" that you get with the MS3 from the get go. It packs in alot of features for not that much money.
The HIDs might not be the best available, but they can be adjusted from inside the car which for me is a "cool" feature. Plus the auto on/off feature is very convenient.
Who doesnt like LED tails?
Auto windshield wipers seem to work pretty well but its more of a "fluff" upgrade.
As mentioned the leather/alcantra interior is amazing. I dont know what can puncture leather and still be safe on cloth??? Also, as the majority of the seat is Alcantra, the whole temperature thing just doesnt make sense.
There may be better sounding factory stereos than this Bose but what it comes with makes up for it. I love having the MPG/distance etc display. As far as I can tell its not the easiest process for most to swap out the stereo and fuel consumption display let alone the cost involved.
So basically $1000 more gets you ALOT.
Nevertheless, the whole GT vs. Sport thing doesnt really matter as we all can appreciate the real reason the MS3 is such a great car, right? For that we all can relate.
