cobb tuning vs. CPE

You would probably want to compare the COBB SF Intake to the CP-e Xcel Nano (listed under the MS3, but it will fit the MS6) to be a more direct comparison.

The CP-e Xcel Cold air is a cold air intake that takes air from down in the fender.

The Cobb takes air from right in the engine bay. So does the CP-e nano

Comes down to personal preference as all three are high quality, and well researched.
 
Anyone hear anything yet

I know Corksport just introduced their full length SRI...anyone hear any pros or cons...I know it's just an intake, but with such a limited aftermarket for our cars, every little bit counts.

Will I still be able to treat the CS FLSRI as I would the SF when I get my AP?
 
so is there difference in hp? because i know there is def a difference in price and since im a little tight on money now since i just bought this car plus school so thats why im deciding if i should buy the cheaper one and trying to see if theres a catch or anything like that
 
I just bought the Corksport Full Length SRI a couple days ago. The reason I went with that is that not only do you get the intake, but you also get the Turbo Inlet all for like...$260 I think I paid. It's under the Speed3 section on PG.

I figured it was the best bang for the buck since restriction on these cars comes not from the intake, but the turbo inlet pipe...to each his own though, just my $.02
 
I just bought the Corksport Full Length SRI a couple days ago. The reason I went with that is that not only do you get the intake, but you also get the Turbo Inlet all for like...$260 I think I paid. It's under the Speed3 section on PG.

I figured it was the best bang for the buck since restriction on these cars comes not from the intake, but the turbo inlet pipe...to each his own though, just my $.02

what kind of car do you drive? and whats so good about an inlet pipe?

sorry for the dumb question. i kno more about evos then ms6 lol so im still learning about this car
 
The turbo inlet on these cars is very restrictive, it's just the pipe that connects the intake to the turbo...I don't know why, but Mazda designed them very poorly for performance and fuel economy...Oh yeah I have a Speed6
 
Last edited:
The turbo inlet on these cars is very restrictive, it's just the pipe that connects the intake to the turbo...I don't know why, but Mazda designed them very poorly for performance and fuel economy...Oh yeah I have a Speed6

well im trying to figure out if i want the cobb.... orr the cpe cai or even this


http://www.***************/MAZDASPEED_Cold_Air_Intake_p/sus8mh32.htm

it shows a lot of hp gains if its true. and to me 20+hp seems a lot.

thats why im trying to figure out if i should spend some extra money or what not..

do you know what i mean
 
well go on street unit. and check out the mazdaspeed 6 intake.... it shows that u get

Largest Gains: 29.9 HP @ 6200 RPM
25.3 ft-lbs @ 6200 RPM
 
Look and see what the other mods are too. I don't think they list it mod for mod, but a cumulative rating over stock numbers...know what I mean?
 
I chose to go with the CP-e nano and the HTP inlet pipe (from GB on the ms3 section). I was going to go with the Corksport full length SRI, but the diameter of the inlet pipe left me a little skeptical. I'd love to give an impression of my setup, but I'm still waiting on my intake since they seem to be on backorder.

It's been a long standing debate on which is better, the CAI or a SRI. Everyone will always have their preferences and swear their opinion is right, but throwing the turbo into the equation changes things a little bit. While a CAI does draw colder and denser air than a SRI, the difference is relatively small and mostly negated by the increased static pressure from a longer pipe and the fact that the air picks up a substantial amount of heat as it passes through the turbo. On a NA car the static pressure increase is less of an issue and there is no heat gain from a turbo so you notice more gains from the CAI setup than a SRI. An efficient intercooler is of far greater importance than a cold dense intake charge in a turbo application. Either way, there are gains from both options.

Of the currently available options, the SRI is less expensive and when coupled with a new turbo inlet (which have seen substantial price decreases with the release of the Cobb and CP-e pipes) greatly reduces restrictions pre-turbo without breaking the bank. In total I have paid less than $400 for my SRI and inlet pipe, but if I had acted a week later I could have probably shaved almost $50 off that cost. As far as HP gains are concerned, HP A + HP B = HP C does not exist and is commonly referred to as "ricer math". Closely related mods will work together to boost each other instead of adding a fixed increase for each one. Listed gains on a website for a given upgrade are no indication of what you are going to see in your given application. Just relax and know with a setup like this you will notice a nice gain in HP and improved throttle response. Exact numbers and feel will vary from car to car since there are so many uncontrollable variables.
 
I chose to go with the CP-e nano and the HTP inlet pipe (from GB on the ms3 section). I was going to go with the Corksport full length SRI, but the diameter of the inlet pipe left me a little skeptical. I'd love to give an impression of my setup, but I'm still waiting on my intake since they seem to be on backorder.

It's been a long standing debate on which is better, the CAI or a SRI. Everyone will always have their preferences and swear their opinion is right, but throwing the turbo into the equation changes things a little bit. While a CAI does draw colder and denser air than a SRI, the difference is relatively small and mostly negated by the increased static pressure from a longer pipe and the fact that the air picks up a substantial amount of heat as it passes through the turbo. On a NA car the static pressure increase is less of an issue and there is no heat gain from a turbo so you notice more gains from the CAI setup than a SRI. An efficient intercooler is of far greater importance than a cold dense intake charge in a turbo application. Either way, there are gains from both options.

Of the currently available options, the SRI is less expensive and when coupled with a new turbo inlet (which have seen substantial price decreases with the release of the Cobb and CP-e pipes) greatly reduces restrictions pre-turbo without breaking the bank. In total I have paid less than $400 for my SRI and inlet pipe, but if I had acted a week later I could have probably shaved almost $50 off that cost. As far as HP gains are concerned, HP A + HP B = HP C does not exist and is commonly referred to as "ricer math". Closely related mods will work together to boost each other instead of adding a fixed increase for each one. Listed gains on a website for a given upgrade are no indication of what you are going to see in your given application. Just relax and know with a setup like this you will notice a nice gain in HP and improved throttle response. Exact numbers and feel will vary from car to car since there are so many uncontrollable variables.


damn you must know a lot.... and what would you prefer though?
 
I do what I can to keep up on things. I chose my setup based on the fact that I can change intakes without having to worry about fitment issues between a new intake and the inlet pipe. Whatever route you decide to go with the intake will be a definite increase over stock. I see no fault with the Corksport full length SRI and hopefully Atreyu will let us know how everything goes once he gets his installed, including a butt dyno impression. The important thing to keep in mind while upgrading your intake is that the stock turbo inlet is your enemy and should be replaced. Since you're trying to keep your budget in mind while doing this I think the Corksport SRI may just be the ideal route for you to go because it takes care of everything up to the turbo for under $300.
 
Last edited:
Haven't recieved the SRI (or anything for that matter yet), but hopefully if the weather stays fairly warm up here, I might just throw my intake on the weekend that I get it. Otherwise it'll be a little while.

Have to do what the weather allows me up here in jolly ol' Wisconsin. I will let you guys know how everything goes though as it seems I'm one of the first few to have purchased this SRI...btw thanks for the explanation on "ricer math." I was trying to explain earlier and didn't quite hit the intake on the air filter. (tuner humor...priceless)
 
I do what I can to keep up on things. I chose my setup based on the fact that I can change intakes without having to worry about fitment issues between a new intake and the inlet pipe. Whatever route you decide to go with the intake will be a definite increase over stock. I see no fault with the Corksport full length SRI and hopefully Atreyu will let us know how everything goes once he gets his installed, including a butt dyno impression. The important thing to keep in mind while upgrading your intake is that the stock turbo inlet is your enemy and should be replaced. Since you're trying to keep your budget in mind while doing this I think the Corksport SRI may just be the ideal route for you to go because it takes care of everything up to the turbo for under $300.

where should i get the inlet and the intake from. any proferred websites?
 
I'm running the MS CAI and soon the Cobb inlet. Solid parts overall.

For good vendors, you can look at Protege Garage, Street Unit, RPM Store, or from Cobb/CP-e/Corksport directly.
 
I'm running the MS CAI and soon the Cobb inlet. Solid parts overall.

For good vendors, you can look at Protege Garage, Street Unit, RPM Store, or from Cobb/CP-e/Corksport directly.

corksport doesnt have the mazdaspeed 6 direct link?

there isnt even a link for a 6 period
 
Back