Here's why I take C&D's opinions with a grain of salt...
In the MSP review they were so desperate for listing negatives that the size of the radio's buttons and it's apparently subsequent complexity (it's like a fisher-price toy compared to some stuff I've seen) was one of them. They also seem to prefer smoothness to handling...which is more about how they classify a car. They group something like the MSP (really an enthusiast's car) properly in comparisons, but in the review they expect it to be as refined as a BMW, and as simple as a coloring book.
Basically, they find something negative about every car they review, just so that they can have a counterpoint.
In the MSP review they were so desperate for listing negatives that the size of the radio's buttons and it's apparently subsequent complexity (it's like a fisher-price toy compared to some stuff I've seen) was one of them. They also seem to prefer smoothness to handling...which is more about how they classify a car. They group something like the MSP (really an enthusiast's car) properly in comparisons, but in the review they expect it to be as refined as a BMW, and as simple as a coloring book.
Basically, they find something negative about every car they review, just so that they can have a counterpoint.