costermonger
Member
- :
- CX-5
^ agree with that; the Forester I tested felt 'heavy' and unresponsive compared to both versions of the CX-5. I didn't feel there was much difference between the AWD and FWD CX-5 in this regard.
Agreed on all points. It's hard to cover every possible variable without losing the main thesis. We could say that winter driving in Hawaii is less stressful than in Alaska as well.Mostly agree with that TreyP. I would add a few things. I would argue that AWD might even be slightly worse at stopping because of the added weight. Also, studded tires are good on ice, don't do much on snow (threads are useful here), and might hamper traction on dry roads since metal has a lower friction coefficient.
Incase you haven't seen this vid, a comparison between AWD with summer tyres and FWD with winter tyres.
http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-video/winter-tyres-vs-4x4
I have no practical experience of the CX5 AWD, yet.
But I suspect its not as good as the Xtrails, which can be selected to run in FWD, auto, or lock via a selector switch.
The system is wasted on me however as mine never moves from auto position.
The Nissan will detect loss of traction in less than one revolution of the wheel, then apply rear wheel drive as required.
It's a shame the CX5 doesn't employ the system that the CRV uses, the latest version actually always sets of in AWD, thus ensuring a clean launch.
Something Mazda should consider?
if you drive in snow occasionally - frequently, I would recommend AWD. I don't drive in snow. FWD works for me.
Remember and choose winter tires before AWD, ideally both. There is no point in AWD if you are driving in snow conditions every winter and leaving summer tires on.