7
70
How about a pic showing the box and stuff?
You have maps, what about a wiring diagram??
You have maps, what about a wiring diagram??
Mateo,yellerandahalf said:dude, it would really easily work on a daily. THis car is driven stone-cold every damn day from my apt to the school parking lot, then for a daily backroads run every night. so it's really doing well. Plus, if you put it on a protege, I already have a program with hours and hours and hours of tuning for ya. it's really not that ballsy when you get into it.
-Mateo
Fede_italiano said:Mateo,
I would like to run the megasquirt in a CBR and I would like to know if you could email me the material used to put together your system.
We can also talk by pm about it.
Nice nice job and great skills
Fede_italiano said:Mateo,
you are using batch firing, right?
Guys Mateo uses the Megasquirt to control fuel.StuttersC said:Its my understanding that is the only way MS works...
StuttersC said:I saw your threads on the Megasquirt board, Mateo...
So, you haven't been able to get the spark to run off the stock ignition set-up? You switched to an older version of the EDIS igntion?
lasermp5 said:but the name just sounds so dirty...
MazdaSpeed626 said:Besides, MAF sensing is MUCH more accurate than MAP sensing. MAP sensing just allows you to be able to tune higher boosted apps because the MAF's air flow capabilities have been maxed out. But up until that point...MAF is the way to go, especially if going NA. (rockon)
Innu_Qc said:So you think the maf would be better than MAP. I was under the impression it was the other way around. I'll look into it a little more I think.
yellerandahalf said:nope, I can't figure out how to trick the coils into firing when i want them to, in order. what MS does is fool the ignition module into advancing or retarding from a mechanical base timing pt. It might be possible to get them to work, but EDIS cost me like 100 bucks, so i just said screw it, i know this works, I'll just do that.
Fede, timing maps are incredibly sensitive to pressure, boost, temperature, etc. it's not really a horespower level thing, but the factors that make horsepower indirectly.
Yes, I'm currently running fuel only, in batch fire mode. MS doesn't do sequential firing, simply b/c it's not practical, it doesn't make a damn bit of difference at >1000rpm.
I'm putting ignition in right now, so I'll be running full standalone within a week, hopefully.
flat_black, I'm using the V2.2 board, aka MSnS. Extra code 24s9 w/ EDIS control. Let me know how that MX 3 project goes, I'd love to lend a hand working out the kinks of MS!
-Mateo
MazdaSpeed626 said:There's no way to "trick" your coils into firing at the right times for your car... This is because your car uses 2 coil packs and is distributorless. The only way for you can use just the megasquirt to drive your coils is if you have a distributor, thus meaning you only have one coil. This is cuz the MS outputs one combined ignition signal which on any distributorless ignition system, you have to have 2 seperate signals, i.e. one for each side of the coil which means that 1 signal fires 2 cylinders at the same time, hence the term, wasted spark. Sooooo, in order to create 2 seperate signals a microprocessor of some sort has to be involved(i.e. EDIS module), or some SERIOUS custom reprogramming and reconfiguring of the megasquirt board needs to be done. I'm not quite sure on the MS II processor being able to do this right now, but if not, anything is possible... But, as far as I know, this is the ONLY way to get ignition control on a distributorless motor(i.e. using some kinda of OEM ignition module GM, Ford, etc.)