Any photographers in here?

oh, ok thanks, might have to start saving up for one so i can join this thread lol
the only decent camera i got is my phone and its only a 2 megapixel hahaha
 
That's about the same price for the Rebel XTi, which is the 10 megapixel Canon equivalent to the D40.

My camera is the 5D, which is $2,500 for the body, then I have around $2,000 in lenses, $2,000 in strobes, $1,000 in on-camera flashes, $1,200 in tripods, etc etc...I have probably $12k in camera gear all told...
 
That's about the same price for the Rebel XTi, which is the 10 megapixel Canon equivalent to the D40.

My camera is the 5D, which is $2,500 for the body, then I have around $2,000 in lenses, $2,000 in strobes, $1,000 in on-camera flashes, $1,200 in tripods, etc etc...I have probably $12k in camera gear all told...

That's a lot of tripods. Do you have any medium format camera gear? What lenses do you shoot with most? Do you shoot your portraits at a home studio or commercial space? What kind of light modifiers do you have for your studio strobes?

Also, its sounds like you recommend the Rebel XTi over the newer D40x; what makes you choose mega pixels over the better ergonomic design and LCD information display of the D40x?
 
That's a lot of tripods. Do you have any medium format camera gear? What lenses do you shoot with most? Do you shoot your portraits at a home studio or commercial space? What kind of light modifiers do you have for your studio strobes?

Also, its sounds like you recommend the Rebel XTi over the newer D40x; what makes you choose mega pixels over the better ergonomic design and LCD information display of the D40x?
It's actually only 1 tripod, and a pano-head, and a few other attachments. The only things I have that are medium format are my Holgas. I shoot with my 50mm the most, and my 17-40L second, I keep a 200mm and a 28-135 IS in my bag just in case I need them.

I disagree that Nikons have better ergonomics. I grew up with Canons, my film cameras were all Canon, my lenses were Canon which played a huge role in my decision to stay Canon when I went digital. Having grown up using Canon, their ergonomics make more sense to me.

Plus, Canon has superior high ISO noise handling, and I do a lot of long-exposure night shots (astrophotography is one of my hobbies) and nightclub work, which demands higher ISO. Until the D3 Nikons have suffered from bad noise over ISO 400, so they just were not suited to the work I enjoy.

I also prefer how Canon's Digic III processor handles color. Back when I bought my 20D, Nikons were still shooting low contrast and really cool, while Canon was punchy contrast and warmer...just a personal preference thing...now I use Lightroom for all my processing and shoot RAW neutral, so the Digic chip doesnt even do anything.

As for the LCD info display, that barely figures into my shooting methods...I still shoot as if I were shooting film, and I only look at the LCD to change a function, or to check the histogram while I'm testing exposures since I dont use a light meter.

But for the purposes of this thread, I was only mentioning the XTi as a comparable option, I dont believe one system is superior to the other for the most part, each has their own pros and cons...it comes down to holding them in your hands and trying to match form and function with your own needs. Some of the most popular shots I've sold were shot with a $16 underwater disposable film camera - when I had a gallery showing with those shots, I kept getting the question "Did you shoot this with the Nikonos system?" and they were blown away when I showed them the el-cheapo tool I used. Cameras are just tools, it's the photographer that makes the image.

Most of my portraits are shot on-location. Sometimes I do my fine art in my garage with my portable backdrop and some roll paper. Other times I borrow studio space from some friends (www.vermillionphoto.com there's a studio tour on that site).

As for light modifiers, I shoot AlienBee strobes, and I use the foldable softboxes that they make... I have about 10 friends who are pros too, and 3 of them shoot AlienBees too, so we all share lights and modifiers to keep our individual costs down.

Any other questions? hehe...
 
Last edited:
I think the important part is what do you want to shoot pics of? its easy enough to say the XTI or D40/D40x but that may not be the right camera to begin with. If you plan on doing sports, wildlife, anything fast moving forget about both of them and move to something with better AF like a 40D. I purchased the XT 13 months ago and quickly realized it was the wrong camera for me and switched to the 20D in a few months, since moved to the 40D because the AF on moving objects is leaps and bounds ahead and crucial for a good keeper rate.

I totally agree with comixx on the noise issue, and as for ergonomics I really have never understood that, if your holding onto the camera 8hrs a day 5 days a week then maybe its of some value but otherwise I really dont get it. I have tried out the D40x and the D80 and I cant say that I found it any better to hold.

Canon just announced the new XSI to replace the XTI so the XTI pricing will start to drop soon.

Ultimately the camera is not the problem its the lenses, tripods, flashes etc like comixx said, thats where the $$$ comes from. I have aquired over 8k of equipment in just 13 months :( over 5k on just lenses. And none of that makes up for skill which I have little of lol.
 
I disagree that Nikons have better ergonomics. I grew up with Canons, my film cameras were all Canon, my lenses were Canon which played a huge role in my decision to stay Canon when I went digital. Having grown up using Canon, their ergonomics make more sense to me.
Nikon's entry level dslr ergonomics are superior to Canon's. Compare the D40 to the XTi and it's quite evident. The materials used on the Nikon entry level bodies are better. The button layout is superior. The menus are subjective but most will find the Nikon menus easier to use. Canon's ergonomics don't get better until you start looking at the prosumer and pro bodies.
 
Nikon's entry level dslr ergonomics are superior to Canon's. Compare the D40 to the XTi and it's quite evident. The materials used on the Nikon entry level bodies are better. The button layout is superior. The menus are subjective but most will find the Nikon menus easier to use. Canon's ergonomics don't get better until you start looking at the prosumer and pro bodies.

I rock a Nikon D50. Not the best camera on the market (actually I don't think it is on the market anymore, LOL). I gotta say I prefer it to my friend's 20D. But then again I gotta say I don't like the D40 either. The lack of an LCD display on top of the camera is a bit of a pain. The menu is slower too which sucks if you're taking pics at say a concert where lighting and subjects constantly change.
 
Ergonomics is 100% subjective. Some like "ergonomic" keyboards, others stick with standards...

For this reason, I'll never agree that Nikon is more "ergonomic" than Canon, just different. What it really boils down to is what feel best to each individual user.

Build materials, though, I will agree with the fact that the base model Nikons are more sturdily built than base model Canons. That's why I never bought a Rebel but went straight to the 20D.

I bought the vertical battery grip for the 20D, and then for the 5D when I bought that camera. I wish I could afford the 1Ds Mk III though...the vertical grip is built into the body, the body itself is more rugged, and weather-sealed. I've shot my 5D in a blizzard, and it got pretty wet and was fine, but I'd love the peace-of-mind that having a pro body would give me. But who has $8k extra just laying around?

Of course, my ultimate dream camera system is the Hasselblad H3D-39 - 39 megapixel, medium format, and only $30k for the body only...
 
That's about the same price for the Rebel XTi, which is the 10 megapixel Canon equivalent to the D40.

My camera is the 5D, which is $2,500 for the body, then I have around $2,000 in lenses, $2,000 in strobes, $1,000 in on-camera flashes, $1,200 in tripods, etc etc...I have probably $12k in camera gear all told...

good god! im just tryin to take a nice picture, not one for a magazine lol
but i guess if i was really into taking picture i would spend that much too
 
Well, when it's your biz or really into your hobby you need the right tools. I'm in the same boat. All I have is a 4 year old non dslr camera, but it gets the job done for me and some clients.
 
2222813448_a17609f854.jpg


2225366402_9bec8621d5.jpg


2224437089_9232087144.jpg
 
LOVE the first shot!!

P.S. - I'm staying out of the camera fanboy fighting. Its all about what you are used to using.....
 
LOVE the first shot!!

P.S. - I'm staying out of the camera fanboy fighting. Its all about what you are used to using.....

There aren't really fanboys for cameras (unless we're talking about Pentax guys). It's just everyone's personal preference. Canons take nice pictures but I don't like the interface. My friend says the same thing about Nikons. Pentax people just wanna be different.
 
Hell, even the armed services are Canon or Nikon camps.

We in the Marine Corps photography field are 100% Canon while the Army is 100% Nikon.

Its all about what you learned on. I am used to Canons interface so a Nikon feels wierd to me.
 
LOL..ya..it's all about preference. And since my XTi is my first real SLR, I liked it. The menus were a bit easier to navigate. TO ME..it was more suited. Plus I have small hands..so the camera was a good fit.
 
Wow, that abandoned barn house is CREEPY. But seriously VERY cool. My boyfriend and I broke into Fairfield Hills (an abandoned Insane Asylum) a few years ago... the pictures I have are not all that great... I wasn't very good with my Rebel yet in dark places.

TowerCloseup.jpg

This is a zoomed in portion of a picture I took of the tower... anybody see the two faces in the woodwork?

HoldingCell3.jpg

Yeah... that's just straight creepy. The face in the wood there looks a bit like Hitler during one of his speeches... gives me a chill looking at it.

I would have been crapping myself in there!
 
Here's one I took yesterday. I asked the pilots if they had gotten lost... Not many coasts to guard in State College, but no, they just wanted food and fuel to continue on to Atlantic City...

Rough life for these guys. On the other hand, they have to fly into the worst s*** imaginable... They are TRUE heroes...

HH65_CG_6522_web.jpg


Oh... and not a bad picture (if I say so myself) for a Rebel XTi... :p

-Jeff
 

New Threads and Articles

Back