Dim said:Needless to say, I am for MTX, but there is one thing to think about.
Over time, a manual might be more expensive to maintain if you consider clutch replacements. Also, once in a while you will not be paying attention and will grind gears (I hope it's not just me (poke)) and your heart will bleed during those moments. So an automatic might be more fool-proof.
I know what you mean. In my post, I was assuming that if both transmissions work reliably, the manual might carry the burden of having to replace the clutch...some time.Mazda3Rookie said:I don't know Dim... I have mo experience with Mazda replacement parts (and I hope it stays that way for a looooooooooong time!), but when my wife's Dodge Grand Caravan transmission went south (at just 80,000 miles, crap...), it was a $2,200 replacement.
I'd guess that a new clutch for the 3 wouldn't cost more than $500-600.
Dim said:I know what you mean. In my post, I was assuming that if both transmissions work reliably, the manual might carry the burden of having to replace the clutch...some time.
But I think that in a Mazda (in a Protege, for example), the automatics are actually not that reliable, so you'll end up replacing the whole transmission. In which case, the manual wins.
Hope this makes sense (peep).
I agree completely. If you treat it nice, it should last.D-rock240 said:Your theory makes sense, but my mechanic friend would say that you are much more likely to have to replace the auto tranny before you have to touch the manual tranny. And if you aren't hard on the clutch there is no reason why it can't last. This excludes autox or street racing.
p5stockr said:manual or auto...
rodslinger said:You can have clutch and gear failures just as easily as an automatic going bad also.
D-rock240 said:Your theory makes sense, but my mechanic friend would say that you are much more likely to have to replace the auto tranny before you have to touch the manual tranny. The clutch takes some of the strain off of the manual tranny, allowing it to hold up longer. And if you aren't hard on the clutch there is no reason why it can't last. This excludes autox or street racing.
goldwing2000 said:I don't know that I would say "Just as easy..."
Clutch and gear problems are definitely less likely than auto tranny problems.
TheMAN said:autocrossing doesn't kill trannys
Well put. It's hard to drive a manual perfectly all the time. Sometimes you are going to put unnecessary wear on it, like when you are tired, for example.Karma_hunden said:I say that the mtx is funner to drive. You're more into the car, but it will definatelly go out on you faster than the atx. I dont know about you, but there are days where im so f'kin exhausted I totally bang on the clutch because I lack the coordination, days where you just want to pull over and sleep on the emergency lane, car stalls, blah blah blah, grinding gears, etc. I like to ride fast sometimes. Yes, I do like to burn rubber on a fast start just for s**** and giggles once in a while. I would say that if you are old, lazy or just not just up for the challenged, then get the auto...
mtx is a commitment, you got to accept it on the good days and the bad days (tired, traffic, *cough*drunk*cough*,etc)...all this of course you get the hang of it and traffic is no longer a pain, etc etc. mtx becomes second nature, but when you start its a pain in ass.
cbc said:Yikes..maybe if you are too tired to shift your car correctly, you shouldn't be out driving?
Ah well...what do I know, just another old & lazy person who'd driven mtx cars all his long life(poke)
cbc said:LOL....I will ship you a case of RedBull?(shocked)