cosmic_spd3
Member
- :
- 08 Speed3..Cosmic Blue Mica
i guess u guys do alot of highway driving..i have on the cobb sri..
Just turned 600 miles. I gave it a wash and detailing. Overall impressions, I like this car. Average 24 mpg, almost as good as an econo-civic. Fit, finish, and quality, are first rate. Performance is way beyond the competition, downright shocking. Brakes are really good, handling is very good too. The CAI was a performance bargain, and improved mileage too. I've gotten used to the shifter, and I think I'll leave it alone. The CAI sheild rattle has been nearly eliminated from loosening the CAI clamps, moveing the CAI to different positions, and re-tightening. The check engine light, went on 3 times, said it had a high rpm lean stumble. Dealer cleared it and said it would take 200 miles for computer to adjust to CAI. He was right, no light, good mileage, and terrific performance, instant throttle response, no lag. So I guess I'm done, I'll leave it alone and enjoy the car.
Nothing at all available to improve shifting, except motor mount.
i have rear motor mount insert from CS, TWM shifter and their bushings. i put them in very early in my time with the car and now that i'm at 4k, i have to say the shifting is wonderful. i've not been a particular fan of cable actuated transmissions since honda decided to go that route with the h-series engines in the 90's, however with the mods i listed it's more than excellent. some report a change to a quality 'yellow metal compatible' synchromesh and/or synth tranny oil can even further improve things, but i have no complaints at this point. when i drive an ms3 with the stock equipment it's frustrating because i know how much better it can be...
the claim about feeling a gain from the motor oil change is laughable, especially in a modern turbo 4 cyl vs. a pushrod V8. just run what the factory recommends for your climate and don't worry about eeking out a potential 1-2 crank horsepower with some thinner weight synthetic- that is just silly and not worth the energy required to process the idea. i know magazines and oil brands have done countless things on this and it's just not worth the energy.
unless i misread it, he was claiming gains from changing the engine oil, not the trans oil. but, no, changing to synth in these cars, for the crankcase, is ideal! i did on mine and i think everyone should. but changing to a different weight of synth in the crankcase, in hopes of gaining power....silly IMO. and like i mentioned, some promote changing the tranny oil, and while it surely can improve things, i'm so pleased with the shifting, etc now that i don't see the need at this time.Agreed about the HP gains but I wouldn't say that changing to synthetic oil is pointless however. I did without a doubt notice a pretty decent improvement in shifting and my clutch was smoother to operate.
unless i misread it, he was claiming gains from changing the engine oil, not the trans oil. but, no, changing to synth in these cars, for the crankcase, is ideal! i did on mine and i think everyone should. but changing to a different weight of synth in the crankcase, in hopes of gaining power....silly IMO. and like i mentioned, some promote changing the tranny oil, and while it surely can improve things, i'm so pleased with the shifting, etc now that i don't see the need at this time.
I know this is off topic but..
You are a very large man (6'4 325lbs), you are over twice my size lol!
The MS3 isn't too small for you?