elderlycoffee
Member
- :
- 2007 Sunlight Silver mazdaspeed 3
why would I want to go from 18's to 16's?
elderlycoffee said:why would I want to go from 18's to 16's?
RPI-Speed3 said:If you buy rims without TPMS, you will just see a light illuminate on the instrument panel that is an exclamation point in between parenthesis (something like this--->) (_!_). It won't affect any other systems on the car.
mikepro said:No annoying dings or chimes from the TPMS?
A light doesn't sound too bad. Means you could order the wheels mounted and balance directly and not have to worry about swapping out the sensors from the original wheels, which would be a major PITA, since you would have to unmount the tire.
Olestra said:Yeah seems like smallest rim size is the way to go, with tallest tire possible due to cost effectiveness. And it doesn't look like there's much wheel gap on those MS3 pics going from 18" to 16".
WagonMan said:Wheel gap should be around the same as no one will be changing the diameter of their wheels that much by going to a small rim size, just changing the ratio of tire to rim height.
Regarding going to the smallest rim, highest profile tire; that is the best from a cost point of view, but the worst from a handling perspective. I don't want to ruin my MS3s handling for 4-5 months of the year. I'm sticking 225 performance winters on the OEM rims to keep the good handling, and also get me through most of the snowy days.
I live in Toronto where the roads a cleared pretty well so I'm not worried about the wider tire as there are few days where you are driving through really deep snow.
Just another point of view.
If I was in Edmonton I would probably not go with the choice I made (the wide, low profile performance winter tire choice). But would go with some skinny, Q rated tires. In deep snow all the MS3s will end up plowing snow as they are a pretty low car. Maybe you could be the first to install hydraulics on the MS3.Olestra said:I suppose handling will be sacrificed and ruin this advantage in the MS3.
You're right, the diameter remains the same. I've seen some cars with really high profile tires - to me the large amounts of rubber is kinda ugly. But that's a small sacrifice to be able to drive through snow and be safe. In Edmonton, my 205 50 17s do ok as well and they aren't an extremely wide tire but I do notice that on bad snow days, my car gets plowed by the snow and it will shift back and forth trying to make it's way through. Our streets get cleaned pretty well too except in residential (nightmare) where it's lower priority. That and the few days the roads get really bad are where I'm glad I have winters, I think it's worth it.
So I would suppose that this is a bit subjective - if you think that most of your driving will be on very light snow and dry/wet pavement even in winter, then you could probably get away with bigger, lower profiles. If you think you're going to get stuck with such wide tires, then smaller steelies and higher profile.
WagonMan said:Regarding going to the smallest rim, highest profile tire; that is the best from a cost point of view, but the worst from a handling perspective. I don't want to ruin my MS3s handling for 4-5 months of the year. I'm sticking 225 performance winters on the OEM rims to keep the good handling, and also get me through most of the snowy days.
Albert said:Here's my MS3 with the 16" steelies and Dunlop Wintersport M3's (from Tirerack):
MightyMouse said:Albert, quick question. It is really hard to tell in the pictures, but are the steel wheels hubcentric? I really don't like using wheels that don't fit the hubs properly.
Albert said:They fit nice and tight on the hubs. Let me know and I'll snap some closeups for you if you want them.
What's the offset on those wheels?Albert said:Here's my MS3 with the 16" steelies and Dunlop Wintersport M3's (from Tirerack):