oaklandopen
Member
today our instructor had written the following on the whiteboard:
1966 10 33.6
2008 10 2.56
he was trying to see if anyone understood what it was. eventually he let ppl know that in 1966 $10 worth of gas was like 33gal, and now that same amt of $ will get you 2.5 gal.
i can remember when i started driving i used to get change back from filling up a tank on $20, and im only 24.
i know that there are those who are truly affected by expensive gas prices, while at the same time there are some to whom $70+ fillups don't affect whatsoever (else why would manufacturers still be mass producing guzzlers like trucks or top end bimmers, mercedes, audis, etc)
as it seems to be going by the time i receive my BM GT premium will be leaning toward $4.50/gal, and my wife cringes more and more for the decision of buying the ms3. my reasoning was that i enjoyed the old 2.3 gt so much i wanted the same car, just this time with more hp. sure, she didn't like the fact that it requires 91 octane, but she enjoyed the car to, and her deal to me was that we exchange vehicles on a weekly basis.
has anyone gotten the ms3 because it was a good comprimise between performance and economy? would any of you have still selected the ms3 if the prices were steady at $2/gal? was gas price more of a factor than the $24k msrp?
curious.
1966 10 33.6
2008 10 2.56
he was trying to see if anyone understood what it was. eventually he let ppl know that in 1966 $10 worth of gas was like 33gal, and now that same amt of $ will get you 2.5 gal.
i can remember when i started driving i used to get change back from filling up a tank on $20, and im only 24.
i know that there are those who are truly affected by expensive gas prices, while at the same time there are some to whom $70+ fillups don't affect whatsoever (else why would manufacturers still be mass producing guzzlers like trucks or top end bimmers, mercedes, audis, etc)
as it seems to be going by the time i receive my BM GT premium will be leaning toward $4.50/gal, and my wife cringes more and more for the decision of buying the ms3. my reasoning was that i enjoyed the old 2.3 gt so much i wanted the same car, just this time with more hp. sure, she didn't like the fact that it requires 91 octane, but she enjoyed the car to, and her deal to me was that we exchange vehicles on a weekly basis.
has anyone gotten the ms3 because it was a good comprimise between performance and economy? would any of you have still selected the ms3 if the prices were steady at $2/gal? was gas price more of a factor than the $24k msrp?
curious.