Nash04 said:You have sold me but can we order them on the web, the closest dealer is 40 miles down the road.
Thanks(peep)
Kaltire has the exclusive rights in Canada, I'm not sure about the US.
Nash04 said:You have sold me but can we order them on the web, the closest dealer is 40 miles down the road.
Thanks(peep)
Mazda3 said:The difference is huge. Changes the whole vehicle. You have to keep in mind the the RSA's and the Turanza's are some of the crappiest all-season tire on the market when it comes to winter performance. The best part about the Nokians is if you get the all-weather ones they ARE all-season. so you don't need two sets of tires. The Nokian WR's perform admirably in ALL weather conditions wet, dry, and snow.
According to Nokian's website, they have 2 versions of the WR series tire: WR Plus (passenger) and WR SUV Plus. The WR Plus are H rated whereas the WR SUV Plus are V rated. Just wanted to confirm which model you actually bought as I think you did mention V rating in an earlier post. Also, I am wondering how they are in warm weather conditions in terms of handling and road noise (I, like you, don't want the hassle of swapping tires twice a year).
I know I'm going to have to replace the Bridgestone's before this winter so I'm starting my research now. The tread patterns are very similar though the SUV version looks at though it might have a little more bite when it comes to winter driving conditions, however there is a considerable price difference between the two: SUV's are $50-$60 dollars more per tire over the "passenger" version WR, yikes!
According to Nokian's website, they have 2 versions of the WR series tire: WR Plus (passenger) and WR SUV Plus. The WR Plus are H rated whereas the WR SUV Plus are V rated. Just wanted to confirm which model you actually bought as I think you did mention V rating in an earlier post. Also, I am wondering how they are in warm weather conditions in terms of handling and road noise (I, like you, don't want the hassle of swapping tires twice a year).
I know I'm going to have to replace the Bridgestone's before this winter so I'm starting my research now. The tread patterns are very similar though the SUV version looks at though it might have a little more bite when it comes to winter driving conditions, however there is a considerable price difference between the two: SUV's are $50-$60 dollars more per tire over the "passenger" version WR, yikes!
I have the V rated WR SUV tires. The dry warm weather handling is about the same as the Goodyear RSA's that came on the vehicle. As I stated before the winter performance is as good as any snow tire except maybe the top 3. The top 3 winter tires would have slightly more grip on glare ice, but not much. The most amazing thing these tires do is handle in the rain. The way these things cut through water in a downpour is UNBELIEVABLE. I have never driven a tire that is even in the same league as these in the rain.
I also have the WR's on our Mazda 3. Those are V-rated too by the way. The passenger car version speed rating depends on the size. I would give pretty much the identical review for them on the 3.
I do know a couple people with the Goodyear Triple treads as well. They seem to be satisfied with the tire. Its the same idea as the WR, I don't know which would be better. I picked the Nokian because I have connections to get good deals on them and I have used their winter tires before and trust the Nokians.
Hope this helps.
Mazda3, how are the Nokian's in summer driving conditions? How has the wear been? I too will be replacing the stock Bridgestones with something else in a couple of weeks or so. I have heard good things about the Nokian's. Could you post pics of yours?
Thanks!(flash)
Dry weather handling is about the same as the factory tire. I have had them for about 11 months now and there is no noticable wear at all. I have my doubts that they will last to 100km's, but the wear seems good so far.
I'm considering the Nokians.... How many km's have you put on your WR's in the past year? How aggressive would you consider your driving style?
I would consider my driving fairly aggressive, and my RSA's are almost dead after 32,000kms. I'm hoping to do better...
I'm just in the debate between going with the WR's for year-round, or Hakkas on dedicated rims (I have a set of 16" rims collecting dust in the garage) with new summer tires next year (maybe ResponseEdge or Advan ST).
Our winters in Ottawa are not *that* bad most of the time, but when we get the snow and ice, you need a decent snow/ice tire. Not sure that I really need the Hakka's, but my worry with the WRs is that after a couple of summers, the winter performance will be no good.
(canada)
Hi,
In Quebec, Canada, we made snow
For many years, I use TOYO tires (I can drive 4 or 5 winter with these tires)
I'm just buy Toyo Open Country G02 + for my CX7. (for this winter)
And I have Toyo Proxes 4 for summer (20 inches naturally).
http://www.toyocanada.com/products/OPATG02plus.asp (10)
They have 235/60R18 size.
Good traction in snow, good responce in mud, good in wet surface, and less expensive then Nokian...
I drive fairly aggressive. I put my foot into it quite often and there are a couple corners on my daily travels that I like to take with out slowing down
My RSA's were half worn out at 10K. The WR's have 14K on them so far and look like new. So far they are everything I hoped they would be. The Haka winters are awesome I had some on my Mazda 6, I wanted to give the WR's a try this time and avoid the hassle of swaping tires at least twice a year.