Why do I buy a 2016 CX-5
- Thread starter Hockeyfan17
- Start date
- :
- RDX Aspec Adv.
I like the CX-5, except the tires. They are really narrow. I know, I know, they are just fine for the car's power level, and narrow is best for snow and rain and ice and almost anything except deep snow/sand, but...
Has anyone gone considerably wider?
- :
- '17-6, '21 CX-5
Hockeyfan17;6401011 [COLOR="#FF0000" said:
I purchased my '16 CX-5 GT after I placed an order with my Subaru dealer on a 2016 Outback Ltd. Didn't consider the Forester because I liked the extra room in the OB, and I had two OB's previously that were trouble free and great for my purposes - long trips. Didn't mind the CVT, it enabled me to get 30 mpg's on just about every trip I took. AWD didn't phase me one way or another since I live in the SE without the harsh snowy winters. The OB's are great vehicles - jack of all trades and master of none.
To make a long story short - my sales manager at my Subie dealer pissed me off when I negotiated the order on the OB by severely low-balling me on my trade in. Took a trip to the Mazda dealer, took a test ride in a new CX-5, and it was all over.......canceled my OB order and drove home with a new CX-5. Was refreshing to have a compact SUV that handles like a sports sedan, and does 0-60 mph with a naturally aspirated 4 cylinder in under 10 seconds. I can live without a few less cubes of cargo space and the AWD. So far I'm really happy I made the switch, the CX-5 brought back a little of the driving excitement that was previously lacking.
BTW - was able to use my OB order as leverage in negotiating with the Mazda dealer........they made me a deal I couldn't refuse.
- :
- 2016 Mazda CX-5 GT with Tech
I do really like the way it looks and drives. Also, I do think it is a good idea as well to get a quote from the Subaru dealer and a trade value so it give me some negotiation leverage as well. Thanks.
littlebear
Member
- :
- 2017 Mazda CX5
http://users.sisna.com/ignatius/subaru/headgasket.html
Take a trip to a Subaru dealership and talk to the head mechanic there. They will fill you in on how many problems they are having with the Subaru engines. It's job security for the mechanics but not fun to deal with as an owner.
Blown head gaskets, oil and coolant leaks, heavy oil consumption, etc.
http://www.techtimes.com/articles/10848/20140723/subaru-excess-oil-consumption-problem-may-lead-to-engine-failure-lawsuit.htm
The reality is the Subaru of today is not the Subaru of yesteryear when they made solid reliable vehicles.
Last edited:
- :
- RDX Aspec Adv.
Interesting. I was unaware this was an issue. You sure it's not just blown out of proportion? Lots of my friends own them and love them. No issues.
- :
- '17-6, '21 CX-5
Should be the other way around - the older Subarus with the EJ series engines which were phased out prior to the FB series engines (which came on from 2012 -2014) were the ones with all the head gasket/oil & coolant leaks. The older Subies were also notorious for wheel bearing problems which have since been resolved. The 2010 - 2012 Outbacks had a front end vibration problem at cruising speeds that was getting OB owners all upset, but also has been resolved since 2013. The oil consumption problem came with the advent of the FB series engines and hence the class action suit against Subaru. The oil burning issue has been supposedly resolved in all FB model applications since 2014.
I have owned five Subies since 2001 (and still have a '13 Impreza Wagon), and was fortunate not to experience any of these problems, but know others on the Subie forums who did. One thing is for certain, their popularity is growing steadily, especially in the NE, West Coast and Mountain states and they seem to be gaining a bigger market niche.
I actually think the optimum time to buy a CX-5 is now.
Problems on early cars should be largely eliminated.
Problems on early cars should be largely eliminated.
- :
- RDX Aspec Adv.
Yes, and gas prices are low. I remember when they spiked, Prius's actually increased in value dramatically. Considering that the CX-5 is one of the most fuel-efficient vehicles that will do what it does (somewhat-AWD + SUV interior/ground clearance), AND runs on 87*, I think that if prices spike again, it will be a lot easier to get rid of your CX-5, and a lot harder to get into one.
I have been going through the same thing. I have narrowed my choices down to CX-5, Toyota RAV4 and Ford Escape. I am not pleased with the ride of the CX-5 and am wondering if I put 18" wheels on it (Gd Touring) if that would smooth out the ride. We do a lot of long distance driving, and I would like something a little more comfortable than my Miatas. An exaggeration, but you get the idea. It seems the other two ride a little better, but the Escape is really pricey and the Toyota is, well, a Toyota. Wish I could make up my mind...
mazdadude
ZOOOOOOOOOM ZOOOOOOOOOM
- :
- '16.5 Mazda CX-5 Touring
Yes you can put 17 inch and up. I am not sure if 16 inches fit?
Hmmm, maybe in the next few months is a good time to snatch up a bunch of clean, low mileage Prius and sell them at a fat profit a year later when gas hits $4/gallon again (thumb)
- :
- RDX Aspec Adv.
If I owned a used car lot, I would. As-is, I'm buying PMAG's and 5.56. That will have a 3-500% market value increase sooner or later...
Gold will have a 3-500% market value increase sooner or later.
IMNSHO, you will have a very long wait in either case.
They will. We have Mazda 3, 16" alloys for our 225/70x16 winter tires.
mazdadude
ZOOOOOOOOOM ZOOOOOOOOOM
- :
- '16.5 Mazda CX-5 Touring
How is the ride with the 16" tires? Do you notice a difference when changing over to these?
I purchased the CX5 because I like the looks of the vehicle foremost, but also because I previously owned a Mazda 3 hatchback which was a very good car. Very few problems and held up very well for a relatively inexpensive vehicle. I considered Subaru also, but in my opinion the styling of most Subaru's is not great and from my research it seems that those cars seem to have many more quirks and problems compared to the Mazda.
