This is a little misleading...UDP's are perfectly balanced...the harmonic resonance stress that affects the crank with a UDP has nothing to do with it being out of balance, and everything to do with it having less mass, or mostly less rotational inertia...
This problem is extremely overhyped though...Crank oscillation is always there...The amount that a stock flywheel and stock drive pulley limit oscillation stress is extremely misunderstood...They barely do...there is still significant stress on the crank with the stock pieces...increasing the output will increase this regardless of if you keep the stock pieces or switch to a lighter dampers...This is the number one reason on why most modern carmakers are using forged cranks in even their small engines recently (the FS didn't always have a forged crank)...heavy flywheels and crank pulleys were not doing a whole lot for oscillation, and cranks were failing well before the rest of the engine...the fact that a lot of engines now utilize forged cranks is the main reason some engines can hold 400whp or more reliably...its not that they kept the heavy stock pieces...its that the crank is extremely strong...
You are correct though...and I am getting off the point...the oscillation stress is far greater with a high torque FI engine compared to a NA engine (higher redlines can cause different types of oscillation though, actually in which it is better to have dampers {thats the s*** on the ends of the crank...in this case a flywheel and a drive pulley} that have less rotational inertia)...If you already have a lightweight flywheel and are planning on boosting to 250+whp, I wouldn't recommend that UDP...but if you are staying NA, or boosting less than that power output...you could have both and be perfectly fine...the forged crank is more than up for a slight increase in resonance...