The effectiveness of traction bars will depend on how they address the source of the displacement that allows the tire to store energy while hooked up and then release as "hop". All of the torque seen at the wheels on a FWD car is taken through the Power unit (engine & transmission) mounts. The source of the windup displacement can also be in deflection of the lower suspension control arms which do not see any torque, but do see forces resulting from traction resulting from applied torque. This displacement can be traced to deflection of the control arms or more likely the rubber bushings used to limit NVH. I am assuming the FWD traction traction bars limit this displacement with rigid links and spherical rod ends. As long as the geometry does not allow binding and NVH transmitted to the body is not excessive, this should be a good thing although, it may be possible to accomplish the same goal with stiffer suspension bushings. See the attached illustration and look at the huge, presumably soft rear bushing. These bushings are integral to the control arm, but it may be possible to destructively disassemble and replace the rubber with a harder material like urethane or preferably Delrin (generic = acetal). It is my guess that if you took a high speed video of MS3 wheel hop, you would see considerable for and aft motion of the wheel relative to the body.
This is not at all the same as traction bars applied to a solid rear axle which address windup due to torque, not suspension deflection due to traction forces. The FWD equivalent to this would be a torque arm mounted the the engine/transaxle assembly that limited its torque related displacement.
The lower control arms appear to be the same for 3 and MS3. Maybe I could pick up a couple used control arms from a wrecking yard and see is a bushing mod is possible. It sounds like there would potentially be a market for a short run of stiff bushing parts if they eliminated hop due to deflection (would also improve handling).
Is anyone parting out a 3 or MS3?
-enganear