DigitalHeadShot said:
This is going to sound odd but me and the guys at dyno4mance, GA had a theory asking if it is better to use a mid grade gasoline over bottom grade. Well research and dyno testing gave proof that useing a mid grade gasoline did infact save money and result in a better a/f rateing and better gas milage. The theory is simple really with cars today ecu learn to adapt to the way we drive and the conditions in which it is used. This brought up the question if the car was used to a richer condition would the ecu compensate for that.... Time for test subjects, Andrew of dyno4mance wife drives a honda van and his monther in law drive the same year honda van (both same model and specs) his wife has always filed up with mid grade gasonline where his mother in law used the "cheap stuff". Well they strapped the two vans down and did base line testing (lol dyno tuned the cars lol) In the end both vans came out with the "same" whp but the intresting part were the a/f curve and slightly more torque from better gas milage. The mid grade van had a much better a/f reading than the "cheap" stuff van. This resulting in less wasted gas.
Now looking at the better gas milage and calculating amout of fills in a month or year even it was easy to see that yes at the gas station you pay 10 cents more but you stop less and get better gas milage. (forgive me I forget the total saveings but it was quite a bit in just a months time) For proof Andrew has a video of the van being dyno'd at Dyno4mance and you can always call and asking about how it was proven that mid grade gasoline gave better gas milage and saves money in the end.
www.dyno4mance.com
anyways my .02, also sorry for the poor writing its late and kinnda tired but if you have question feel free to message me or contact andrew at dyno4mance the only tuneing shop I will use for my toys (cool)
Hi there
I have just read your post and there are a few things to correct....
The savings over the lifetime of the van that run the higher octane fuel were calculated at over $300.00...(over three years)
Both filters were changed for new..
More torque was actually displayed lower down the rpm on the van running the richer fuel map, this is quite normal and we see this happen all the time when mapping various cars.
All that was happening was the ECU on the Van running the better gas had selected a fuel trim that optimized the vans performance, reliability and drivability...this happened to be a full 1.5 points in A/F above 40% TP than the van that run the 87 octane gas..
To conclude the test a tank of 93 oct was put through the van over the next week and the van was re dynoed with the same grade fuel in as the first van, the results of that final test showed that once the fuel was changed to a higher octane this vans ECU had selected the exact same map as the first van we dynoed a week previously.
It is not uncommon for some ECU's that are reset on the dyno to display a very rich condition on the very next pull....this is done naturally on purpose to allow the ECU to collect data before selecting the relevant fuel map.
Todays modern ECU's have multiple fuel maps/trims programmed into them. we have observed many times different fuel trims being used on the same make model year vehicle depending on a number of factors....if you think about it this is logical as the same vehicle is sold into different markets...for example California with 91 octane, the south west with thier oxygenated fuel and colorado where the altitude exceeds 9-10,000 ft above sea level an so on
by making multiple fuel/timing maps available to the ECU the performance and reliability remains safe and constant no matter where it is sold in North America.
If I get time later I will post both graphs...
Hope this helps your debate...
regards
Andrew
Dyno4mance.com