spoolinmp3 said:Honda = crappy f/i motor
Hondas cannot reliably handle more than 7psi of boost. They are the weakest platform to work on. The problem is not the rods and pistons but there weak blocks. Honda need a lot of work to get boosted serously
Honda blocks are usually not designed for high boost, but its really not the blocks that cant take it, it IS actually the rods.
Honda motors have higher than average compression ratios which as most people know aren't exactly suitable for boost (ping/detonation).
w00dy said:WoW, that was the most uninformed post i have ever read.
Being a Honda Tuner i think i would know what the motors can take and not take. I can defently tell you that Honda Motors can take 9lbs of boost daily. Depending on the motor is depending on the weakness.
Any 1.8 non vtec motors out of RS/LS and GS integra are wicked to boost. the rods are the strongest rods that honda have built and can withstand alot of boost. Its mainly the pistons that are weak. but they are only weak if you daily ride the boost higher then 9lbs. I know a few people who have backyard turbo setups and only have a FPR stock injectors and pump and run great w/ 9lbs of boost. The major thing that probably goes is the clutch if its not changed![]()
Not all honda's have higher then normal CR, Type R yes.. but why would u boost it.. GS-R Can handle boost 10.1:1 CR pistons but obviouly nothing more then 7lbs, SiR 11.2:1 CR you'll need to get lower compresion pistons or get a thicker head gastket, RSX-S, 10:1 obvious.. very similar to the GS-R. Those are the highest of high CR motors out there except for s2000 cuz i don't know the CR.. all the others are in the 9's and maybe one or 2 in the 8's.
Probably the weakest motor to boost would be the b20 out of the CRV. 2.0L motor is basicly a 1.8 motor bored to 2.0L. The biggest problem with it is the cylinder walls being to thin. you need to resleave that puppy if you even think of boosting it.. what eventually happens is that you'll cracking cylinders. Which is probably where spoolinmp3 got his info.
So ya before making an edjamacated guess and being completly wrong.. Research..
thats my 2 cents.
Glowmunkey said:And who paid 21-22K for their MazdaSpeed?? I know my dad just bought a 2003.5 (guess he liked mine a lot) for 16,200 at like 3%...
gene in cincinnati said:Yeah. I would rather get a used 99 or 00 Audi A4 1.8 Quattro Turbo. You can easily chip it to 207hp and a 240 plus lb/ft of torque. Not bad for a less than $22,000 investment. Plus, it's a proven aftermarket platform, compared to the Protege.
cbcbd said:People who got the 2003s when they first came out and dealerships didn't know that soon these cars would still be taking up space in their lots a year later.
yeah..me too...I expected them to go off the lot like the MP3's....so I had a deposit down in Oct. 2002, and paid 20K at the end of Jan '03 for my MSP....8 moths later there was a new black mica on their lot for less than 16K!...oh well....I got burned w/ price, but I still love my car!Toyo Kogyo said:Lol, that was me. I ended up paying 24k for my Mazdaspeed after I was 4k upside down in the other Protege I traded in.
naaa....I just saw the thread revived yesterday, and had a quick comment....I don't care to argue the goods/bads/uglies...I just had a 2-cents thing.SuperSpud said:jesus god.. we CANT start arguing this again.. it was from like, 2 years ago...