The hot 6 is coming!

haha, i have no trouble finding parking spots with our 15passenger van...and who cares about nimble when you can have a kick ass pseudo-luxury sports sedan with 300hp(rockon)

although I prolly couldnt afford it, I would most definitely take an MS6 over an MS3...same as I would take a 6s over a 3s :D
 
protegeV said:
although I prolly couldnt afford it, I would most definitely take an MS6 over an MS3...same as I would take a 6s over a 3s :D
6s: big, heavy, slow, not many mods available
3s: smaller, lighter, more nimble, HiBoost turbo

The 3s owns the 6s & if the MS3 comes out, I think I'd prefer that over the MS6.
 
well if yur gonna talk about turbos, there's already one out for the 6i(I believe they just need to make new IC piping to fit the 3s)

Turbo3.0 will pwn all if they make it...plus the 6 looks better already :cool:
 
Black Majik MSP said:
6s: big, heavy, slow, not many mods available
3s: smaller, lighter, more nimble, HiBoost turbo

The 3s owns the 6s & if the MS3 comes out, I think I'd prefer that over the MS6.

not many mods your silly. no turbo um hiboost greddy and some other are in prototype form and um if you wanna see a custom turbo kit go to www.vegasmazdas.com and see the pic section of kid from cali I know
 
there's a guy around here with a turbo 6 too...not sure if its a 2.3 or 3.0 though...I was at a meet in NoVa, and afterwards someone told me one of the 6's was turboed...
 
protegeV said:
well if yur gonna talk about turbos, there's already one out for the 6i(I believe they just need to make new IC piping to fit the 3s)

Turbo3.0 will pwn all if they make it...plus the 6 looks better already :cool:
I was quoting your comparison of the 2 s models. The 6i is the way to go if you want to mod a 6, but you get the same engine in the 3s & it's lighter & more nimble like I said.

Right now, I think a 3 sedan with the factory kit & wing looks just as good as a 6 with the factory kit & wing.

As for turbos, it's much easier to work on a 4cyl & the 2.3L with HiBoost makes more power than you can put to the ground anyway. Making a turbo for the 3.0L is a waste of $$ & there isn't much demand. Why do you think Mazda went with the 4cyl turbo for the MS6 instead of the V6TT originally on the 626 MPS?
 
I don't care I like it, anything to get Mazda to be seen equal or even on top of things would be awesome. It puts a better reputation of Mazda's on the outside of this community.
 
s***, that car is damn awesome AWD, 4 cyl. turbo, a lot of power, 18". Sounds to me like my dream car.
 
protegeV said:
uh, what?(screwy)
mazda6main.jpg


311499_65_full.jpg


hmm, i guess if ya add a fmic on it ,a wing, and a vented hood, there isn't the slightest amount of resemblence. i quess im the only one.
 
Last edited:
Aside from being white and sedans, I don't see it. Headlights are different, grills are totally different, the body lines angle up much more on the 6 as you go toward the back compared to the Evo...

... wait, they both have four wheels!
 
the similarities don't end there! they both have an engine, 4 doors, a trunk, seats.. a steering wheel.. the list goes on and on!
 
seanmcsean said:
the similarities don't end there! they both have an engine, 4 doors, a trunk, seats.. a steering wheel.. the list goes on and on!
(lol)(lol)(lol)
 
I hate the accord coupe grill they put on it. Ug. That'll be the first thing I rip off the car...when it comes out in 2006/2007 :).
 
Back