C
CX5_Pete
I am really mad that Mitsu killed the EVO.
The one dealer closest to me still have about 8 2015's left. So sad to see them just sitting there. I would love to get one, but the insurance is killer.
I am really mad that Mitsu killed the EVO.
The one dealer closest to me still have about 8 2015's left. So sad to see them just sitting there. I would love to get one, but the insurance is killer.
I will trade you non-leather 2016 CX-5 steering wheel for a leather steering wheel.
Sweet! Modified Evo in the stable here as well.
Sweet! Modified Evo in the stable here as well.
Really? Why? I pay similar to my CX-5 as I did my C6 Z06, as I did to my 370Z. I think they varied something like $30 a month between the extremes among the 3, for very similar coverages.
Not sure. I do have some major speeding tickets when I was younger, but those are approaching a decade now. Just how Statefarm prices it I guess.
The CX-5 is my wife's car. I have a G35 and a motorcycle. I also have access to my brother's Miata and motorcycle as well. For what it's worth, this is a pretty "good" handling vehicle. It handles and corners very good for a SUV in my opinion. Would be nice if it's a manual transmission though. Wishful thinking. (2thumbs)
Yes, I actually test drove it back then just for fun. The 2.0 is just way under power. They need to make it for the 2.5.
I have the 2.0 with a 6 speed manual and could not be happier. I'm over 50 and dont really want to be driving that fast anyway. I do like the gas mileage. I took a trip from Houston to San Antonio a few weeks ago ( 3 hour drive ). I got 46mpg on the way there. I had the windows down on the way back and got 43mpg. With the quick steering, great shifting manual trans, and handling characteristics, mazda could not have done better for me.
Yeah I agree. I don't get why the don't just use the 2.5 across the board. Why even bother offering the 2.0 when its known to be underpowered. Is it really just so they can claim 35mpg with the 2.0?
Yeah I agree. I don't get why the don't just use the 2.5 across the board. Why even bother offering the 2.0 when its known to be underpowered. Is it really just so they can claim 35mpg with the 2.0?