Some guys are even replacing the new stock tires with only 500 miles on them before they have ever touched snow. WTF?
Not sure, does the 2010 have the same exact tires that the 2007 had?
I agree as well. This winter we've already had about 50 inches of snow and I have driven each snow day after clearing the driveway. The stock duellers on the CX9 are every bit as good as OEM tires on Mercedes, Nissan and Jeep SUV's I've owned. I think it is a self perpetuating forum hysteria that continues to trash talk the Duellers. That or simply lack of experience driving in snow. Some guys are even replacing the new stock tires with only 500 miles on them before they have ever touched snow. WTF? I really love the "documentation" of the Duellers failings by quoting silly amateur and biased comments from tirerack.com as "evidence". I haven't found a single professional tire review that trashed the Duellers performance in snow and ice, indeed they perform quite well in scientifically more valid road tests.
For most of us it may not even be necessary or advisable to get snow tires. I have debated whether to get snow tires for the winter season (never did with the other SUVs) but have decided to hold off. If I lived in a rural snowy area or in mountains etc or even if I drove every weekend to a ski area, I'd probably get snows. However, living in the Boston burbs where we get about 6 or 7 good snow storms a year, I figure there are about 10-15 days a year when there is actual snow on the driving surface. That means that even in the winter of approx 120 days only about 10% of driving at most will be on snowy roads (recall I am talking about suburbs and urban driving or interstate driving not rural or mountain roads). If you consider that snow tires are demonstrably less effective on pavement, wet or dry, than all season tires, it seems silly to put on snow tires to improve handling in 10% of winter driving at the cost of worse handling and braking for the other 90%.