S. Korean hostage executed

I think Matthew is meaning that in the worlds view. Bush represents our country. So in turn. He represents you. His decision is the decision of OUR country
 
katsmp3 said:
these..

* Over 400,000 kids have up-to-date immunizations.

* School attendance is up 80% from levels before the war.

* Over 1,500 schools have been renovated and rid of the weapons stored
there so education can occur.

* The port of Uhm Qasar was renovated so grain can be off-loaded from
ships faster.

* The country had its first 2 billion barrel export of oil in August.

* Over 4.5 million people have clean drinking water for the first time
ever in Iraq.

* The country now receives 2 times the electrical power it did before
the war.

* 100% of the hospitals are open and fully staffed, compared to 35%
before the war.

* Elections are taking place in every major city, and city councils are
in place.

* Sewer and water lines are installed in every major city.

* Over 60,000 police are patrolling the streets.

* Over 100,000 Iraqi civil defense police are securing the country.

* Over 80,000 Iraqi soldiers are patrolling the streets side by side
with US soldiers.

* Over 400,000 people have telephones for the first time ever.

* Students are taught field sanitation and hand washing techniques to
prevent the spread of germs.

* An interim constitution has been signed.

* Girls are allowed to attend school.

* Textbooks that don't mention Saddam are in the schools for the first
time in 30 years.
The things you listed above I can go with you on that.

Link doesn't work.
 
katsmp3 said:
I think Matthew is meaning that in the worlds view. Bush represents our country. So in turn. He represents you. His decision is the decision of OUR country
He doesn't represent me cause I did not vote for his ass. but I see where you are coming from. Sad thing is, He doesn't suffer for his bad decision makings. We do.
 
If we are going to fight terror we fight it where ever it is. Terrorists dont have territory lines, they are everywhere, even your best friend can be one. Thats why we are in Iraq, because they came here and started s***, so now its war. This means we go where they are, kill them and then go somewhere else and do it again. This is how war will be from now on, no lines, no bounderies, in cold blood. You can thank the Japs, and Palestinians for that.
 
Matthew said:
no one should give a flying ****. weve saved THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of iraqi lives by ousting that ******* asshole. im sure Kat can post the other accomplishments since the war (from the other thread you posted in Kat)...if that isnt enough reasons for you, then you should take your protege into your garage and start it.
Um, the point being is the president lied to put YOU in harms way. If lying about a BJ is a big deal then this should be impeachment huh (no I'm not a huge clinton fan but a lie is a lie)? Why isn't it? Because the worlds playground bully W has the sensitivity issue related to terrorism and national security to protect him. He essentially used the nations fear to fuel his personal agenda. That why we should give "a flying ****". I have no issue with ousting saddam, fighting for safety of the US and other countries, end terrorism it's all fine. I have problem with a lying president serving his own agenda and lying to the public putting YOU in harms way.
 
ghostP5 said:
If we are going to fight terror we fight it where ever it is. Terrorists dont have territory lines, they are everywhere, even your best friend can be one. Thats why we are in Iraq, because they came here and started s***, so now its war. This means we go where they are, kill them and then go somewhere else and do it again. This is how war will be from now on, no lines, no bounderies, in cold blood. You can thank the Japs, and Palestinians for that.

What are you talking about? What terror has Saddam cause here in the US?
 
Matthew said:
1) who ever said the war would end once we caught saddam?
2) people are committing suicide over there because assholes like you dont support them and what they are fighting for. if the US would have home support morale would be much higher. instead you assholes keep authorizing not to give us worthwhile pay increases, or increases in our force until its too late, causing people to have to serve more than one tour overseas.

(werd)
 
Akaveli said:
What are you talking about? What terror has Saddam cause here in the US?
not what hes done, what hes paid for, or helped pay for
 
Nono, remember George Bush set that up, and all those people that died were stunt people.



Akaveli said:
oh let me guess....are you going to say 9/11 too?
 
ghostP5 said:
not what hes done, what hes paid for, or helped pay for
And what informative information is that since you happen to know and not many other people know.?
 
I'm not going to get into this much *hopefully* other than to say a couple things:

to those that view 'liberal' as a condescending remark... do you not realize that most 'liberals' are hoping for the exact same thing that you are: a better America to pass on to future generations, we (assuming I will catch a liberal label) just view things as a different way to do that. don't attack someone because they see a different perspective that you don't grasp/believe in.

since the Gulf War Saddam killed approximately 2 million people (horrific on its own) yet in the same period 10 million people have been killed/systematically starved to death in N. Korea whilst the military wants for nothing (3rd largest in the world by last count). the thing that most people that have a problem with this war/the admin/the reasons for going is that many believe that the war was necessary but is approximately a decade early and was done so with full knowledge as such...
 
ghostP5 said:
Nono, remember George Bush set that up, and all those people that died were stunt people.
Actually I do remember. Cause my Mother works a few blocks from that building but thank GOD she didn't have to preform any stunts for the american public to see on national TV.
 
i like this whole 'pre-emptive war' concept GW Bush and his cronies come up with....

sounds like an invasion to me......
 
oh yeah that numbnut Michael Moore's new movie 'Farenheit 9/11' is coming out this week, anyone planning to see it?
 
Well.. here are a few articles that show Saddam's support for terrorism


List of newspaper article in the 90's which mention the world's concern regarding the growing relationship between OBL and Saddam: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/946809/posts?page=1

Son of Saddam coordinates OBL activities:http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/951911/posts

The AQ connection (excellent):http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/944617/posts?page=2

Western Nightmare: http://www.guardian.co.uk/alqaida/story/0,12469,798270,00.html

Saddam's link to OBL: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/866105/posts

NYT: Iraq and AQ agree to cooperate: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/985906/posts

Document linking them: http://tennessean.com/nation-world/archives/03/06/34908297.shtml?Element_ID=34908297

Iraq and terrorism - no doubt about it: http://www.nationalreview.com/robbins/robbins091903.asp

A federal judge rules there are links:http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/986293/posts

Wall Street Journal on Iraq and AQ:http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/987129/posts

Iraq and Iran contact OBL: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/981055/posts

More evidence: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=%2Fnews%2F2003%2F04%2F27%2Fwalq27.xml

Saddam's AQ connection: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/969032/posts

Further connections: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1007969/posts

What a court of law said about the connections:
http://usinfo.state.gov/topical/pol/terror/98110402.htm

Some miscellaneous stuff on connections:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/989201/posts

Saddam's Ambassador to Al Qaeda: (February 2004, Weekly Standard)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1083778/posts

Yes - it's NewsMax but loaded with interesting bullet points.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/1097521/posts?page=1

Saddam's Fingerprints on NY Bombing (Wall Street Journal, June 1993)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1115387/posts

Colin Powell: Iraq and AQ Partners for Years (CNN, February 2003)
http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/02/05/sprj.irq.alqaeda.links/

The Iraq-Al Qaeda Connections (September 2003, Richard Miniter)
http://www.techcentralstation.com/092503F.html

Oil for Food Scandal Ties Iraq and Al Qaeda (June 2003)
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1125899/posts

Saddam and OBL Make a Pact (The New Yorker, February 2003):
http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?030210fa_fact

Al Qaeda's Poison Gas (Wall Street Journal, April 2004):
http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110005016

Wolfowitz Says Saddam behind 9/11 Attacks:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/921398/posts

Saddam behind first WTC attack - PBS, Laurie Mylroie:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/gunning/interviews/mylroie.html

Growing Evidence of Saddam and Al Qaeda Link, The Weekly Standard, July 2003:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/946997/posts

Qusay Hussein Coordinated Iraq special operations with Bin Laden Terrorist Activities, Yossef Bodansky, National Press Club
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/951911/posts

The Western Nightmare: Saddam and Bin Laden vs. the Rest of the World, The Guardian Unlimited:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/alqaida/story/0,12469,798270,00.html

Saddam Link to Bin Laden, Julian Borger, The Guardian, February 1999
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/866105/posts

The Al Qaeda Connection, The Weekly Standard, July 2003
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/944617/posts?page=2
Cheney lectures Russert on Iraq/911 Link, September 2003:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/982713/posts

No Question About It, National Review, September 2003
http://www.nationalreview.com/robbins/robbins091903.asp

Iraq: A Federal Judges Point of View
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/986293/posts

Mohammed's Account links Iraq to 9/11 and OKC:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/987075/posts

Free Republic Thread that mentions so me books Freepers might be interested in on this topic:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/977221/posts?page=8

The Proof that Saddam Worked with AQ, The Telegraph, April 2003:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=%2Fnews%2F2003%2F04%2F27%2Fwalq27.xml

Saddam's AQ Connection, The Weekly Standard, September 2003
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/969032/posts

September 11 Victims Sue Iraq:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2237332.stm

Osama's Best Friend: The Further Connections Between Al Qaeda and Saddam, The Weekly Standard, November 2003

Terrorist Behind 9/11 Attacks Trained by Saddam, The Telegraph, December 2003
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1007969/posts

James Woolsey Links Iraq and AQ, CNN Interview, March 2004, Also see Posts #34 and #35
http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/1104121/posts

A Geocities Interesting Web Site with maps and connections:
http://www.geocities.com/republican_strategist/Iraq-Bin-Laden.html

Bin Laden indicted in federal court, read down to find information that Bin Laden agreed to not attack Iraq and to work cooperatively with Iraq:
http://usinfo.state.gov/topical/pol/terror/98110402.htm

Case Closed, The Weekly Standard, November 03
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/378fmxyz.asp

CBS - Lawsuit: Iraq involved in 9/11:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/09/05/september11/main520874.shtml

Exploring Iraq's Involvement in pre-9/11 Acts, The Indianapolis Star:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/746225/posts

The Iraq/AQ Connection: Richard Minister again
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/989201/posts

Militia Defector says Baghdad trained Al Qaeda fighters in chemical weapons, July 2002
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/743892/posts

The Clinton View of Iraq/AQ Ties, The Weekly Standard, December 2003
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/527uwabl.asp

Saddam Controlled the Camps (Iraq/AQ Ties): The London Observer, November 01
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/741676/posts

Saddam's Terror Ties that Critics Ignore, National Review, October 2003:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1005579/posts
 
ZoomZoomH said:
oh yeah that numbnut Michael Moore's new movie 'Farenheit 9/11' is coming out this week, anyone planning to see it?
we have a whole thread going on that debate also... its titled "great movie"
 
Back